From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752153AbcFFILg (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2016 04:11:36 -0400 Received: from www62.your-server.de ([213.133.104.62]:48274 "EHLO www62.your-server.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751728AbcFFILe (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2016 04:11:34 -0400 Message-ID: <5755302D.1000708@iogearbox.net> Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 10:11:25 +0200 From: Daniel Borkmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Z Lim CC: kbuild test robot , kbuild-all@01.org, "David S. Miller" , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Yang Shi , Alexei Starovoitov , Network Development , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] arm64: bpf: implement bpf_tail_call() helper References: <201606050700.BLJUHUk2%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <5753DA61.3000505@iogearbox.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-Sender: daniel@iogearbox.net Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/06/2016 06:56 AM, Z Lim wrote: [...] > How about the attached patch? Fixes compilation error on build > !CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL. > > Also, should this patch be sent to net or net-next (along with this series)? Looks good, feel free to add: Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann I think net-next along with your series should be fine since the issue first appeared there. Thanks, Zi!