From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753390AbcFGEaU (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2016 00:30:20 -0400 Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:42975 "EHLO bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751118AbcFGEaS (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2016 00:30:18 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/143] 3.10.102-stable review To: Willy Tarreau References: <1465122046-9645-1-git-send-email-w@1wt.eu> <20160607034657.GA8961@roeck-us.net> <20160607040908.GA12457@1wt.eu> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org From: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: <57564DD3.3050601@roeck-us.net> Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 21:30:11 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160607040908.GA12457@1wt.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated_sender: linux@roeck-us.net X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - bh-25.webhostbox.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - roeck-us.net X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: bh-25.webhostbox.net: authenticated_id: linux@roeck-us.net X-Authenticated-Sender: bh-25.webhostbox.net: linux@roeck-us.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Willy, On 06/06/2016 09:09 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi Guenter, > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 08:46:57PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 12:18:23PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: >>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at : >>> https://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/stable-review/patch-3.10.102-rc1.gz >>> >> >> Hi Willy, >> >> my auto-builder can not pick up a stable release candidate from a >> tarball like this. > > I guess you mean from a patch, since it's a patch and not a tarball :-) > Whatever it is :-) >> Do you have a repository, either with the patch >> series or with the to-be-tested branch, where the builder could >> pick it up ? > > I don't but I can set something up for you. Would you be OK with a > branch in my account (eg: "3.10-for-guenter") which I "git push -f" > from my local branch ? That way you always pull from the same branch > and we don't care if patches are removed during the process. Just let > me know. Otherwise let me know if a different form is desired. > Yes, that would be excellent. I would suggest to name it something like stable-3.10-queue, though, to be a bit more generic. After all, other testers will want to pick it up as well. Thanks, Guenter