From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@lightbits.io>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@intel.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
leon@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] IB/core: remove dead code
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 15:41:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5756C0E0.7090303@lightbits.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1465247706-4418-1-git-send-email-sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
On 07/06/16 00:15, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> prot_sg_cnt has been assigned with the value of ret which we have
> already checked to be non-zero so prot_sg_cnt can never be zero at this
> point of the code and hence the else part can never execute.
> And since we know prot_sg_cnt is non zero there is no use for the
> if condition also.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/core/rw.c | 24 ++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/rw.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/rw.c
> index 1eb9b12..a829a14 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/rw.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/rw.c
> @@ -386,21 +386,17 @@ int rdma_rw_ctx_signature_init(struct rdma_rw_ctx *ctx, struct ib_qp *qp,
> count += ret;
> prev_wr = &ctx->sig->data.reg_wr.wr;
>
> - if (prot_sg_cnt) {
> - ret = rdma_rw_init_one_mr(qp, port_num, &ctx->sig->prot,
> - prot_sg, prot_sg_cnt, 0);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - goto out_destroy_data_mr;
> - count += ret;
> + ret = rdma_rw_init_one_mr(qp, port_num, &ctx->sig->prot,
> + prot_sg, prot_sg_cnt, 0);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto out_destroy_data_mr;
> + count += ret;
>
> - if (ctx->sig->prot.inv_wr.next)
> - prev_wr->next = &ctx->sig->prot.inv_wr;
> - else
> - prev_wr->next = &ctx->sig->prot.reg_wr.wr;
> - prev_wr = &ctx->sig->prot.reg_wr.wr;
> - } else {
> - ctx->sig->prot.mr = NULL;
> - }
> + if (ctx->sig->prot.inv_wr.next)
> + prev_wr->next = &ctx->sig->prot.inv_wr;
> + else
> + prev_wr->next = &ctx->sig->prot.reg_wr.wr;
> + prev_wr = &ctx->sig->prot.reg_wr.wr;
>
> ctx->sig->sig_mr = ib_mr_pool_get(qp, &qp->sig_mrs);
> if (!ctx->sig->sig_mr) {
>
Actually it looks like the data-integrity insert/strip operation
(where protection sg list does not exist) is broken.
It looks that the protection scatterlist should be done only if
prot_sg_count was provided...
I don't have access to mlx5 devices at the moment (still waiting
to get some...)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-07 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-06 21:15 [PATCH v2] IB/core: remove dead code Sudip Mukherjee
2016-06-07 7:33 ` Leon Romanovsky
2016-06-07 12:41 ` Sagi Grimberg [this message]
2016-06-07 12:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-07 13:14 ` Sagi Grimberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5756C0E0.7090303@lightbits.io \
--to=sagi@lightbits.io \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=hal.rosenstock@gmail.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sean.hefty@intel.com \
--cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox