Re: [PATCH v9 5/5] usb: dwc3: core: cleanup IRQ resources

[Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>]

On 07/06/16 14:49, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> On 06/07/2016 12:34 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> On 02/06/16 14:52, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>>> On 06/01/2016 10:46 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>>> Implementations might use different IRQs for
>>>> host, gadget and OTG so use named interrupt resources
>>>> to allow Device tree to specify the 3 interrupts.
>>>>
>>>> Following are the interrupt names
>>>>
>>>> Peripheral Interrupt - peripheral
>>>> HOST Interrupt - host
>>>> OTG Interrupt - otg
>>>
>>> or "dwc_usb3"??
>>
>> That is for backward compatibility only. I could explicitly
>> mention it in the next line.
> 
> yes pls, this confuses.
>  Also I don't see how "otg" irq name is used in code.
> 

OK. I'll remove it from the commit message.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> We still maintain backward compatibility for a single named
>>>> interrupt for all 3 interrupts (e.g. for dwc3-pci) and
>>>> single unnamed interrupt for all 3 interrupts (e.g. old DT).
>>>
>>> bindings
>>
>> OK.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> v9: rebased on top of balbi/testing/next
>>>>
>>>>    drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c   | 10 ----------
>>>>    drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
>>>>    drivers/usb/dwc3/host.c   | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>>    3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
>>>> index 9c4e1d8d..5cedf3d 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
>>>> @@ -843,16 +843,6 @@ static int dwc3_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>        dwc->mem = mem;
>>>>        dwc->dev = dev;
>>>>
>>>> -    res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0);
>>>> -    if (!res) {
>>>> -        dev_err(dev, "missing IRQ\n");
>>>> -        return -ENODEV;
>>>> -    }
>>>> -    dwc->xhci_resources[1].start = res->start;
>>>> -    dwc->xhci_resources[1].end = res->end;
>>>> -    dwc->xhci_resources[1].flags = res->flags;
>>>> -    dwc->xhci_resources[1].name = res->name;
>>>> -
>>>>        res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>>>>        if (!res) {
>>>>            dev_err(dev, "missing memory resource\n");
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
>>>> index c37168d..c18c72f 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
>>>> @@ -1726,7 +1726,7 @@ static int dwc3_gadget_start(struct usb_gadget *g,
>>>>        int            ret = 0;
>>>>        int            irq;
>>>>
>>>> -    irq = platform_get_irq(to_platform_device(dwc->dev), 0);
>>>> +    irq = dwc->irq_gadget;
>>>>        ret = request_threaded_irq(irq, dwc3_interrupt, dwc3_thread_interrupt,
>>>>                IRQF_SHARED, "dwc3", dwc->ev_buf);
>>>>        if (ret) {
>>>> @@ -1734,7 +1734,6 @@ static int dwc3_gadget_start(struct usb_gadget *g,
>>>>                    irq, ret);
>>>>            goto err0;
>>>>        }
>>>> -    dwc->irq_gadget = irq;
>>>>
>>>>        spin_lock_irqsave(&dwc->lock, flags);
>>>>        if (dwc->gadget_driver) {
>>>> @@ -2853,6 +2852,23 @@ static irqreturn_t dwc3_interrupt(int irq, void *_evt)
>>>>    int dwc3_gadget_init(struct dwc3 *dwc)
>>>>    {
>>>>        int                    ret;
>>>> +    struct resource *res;
>>>> +    struct platform_device *dwc3_pdev = to_platform_device(dwc->dev);
>>>> +
>>>> +    dwc->irq_gadget = platform_get_irq_byname(dwc3_pdev, "peripheral");
>>>> +    if (dwc->irq_gadget <= 0) {
>>>
>>> Is it expected to get -EPROBE_DEFER here?
>>
>> Probably not as we don't have any chance of deferring probe here. We've already
>> probed successfully and are just turning on the gadget mode here.
> 
> In general, you can't say that you've been probed successfully if not all resources are ready,
> and irq is a resource :)
> It's expected that all resources will be requested in probe, but here you are trying to get
> resource outside of probe. As result, it will be perfectly possible to get -EPROBE_DEFER here
> if on some HW GPIO IRQ will be used as peripheral, or host or otg irq (for example), because 
> GPIO IRQ controller might not be ready at the moment when IRQ resource is requested.

I agree with you.

Felipe, are you ok with moving the IRQ resource obtaining code to probe?

--
cheers,
-roger