Re: [PATCH v3] ASoC: rockchip: Add machine driver for MAX98357A/RT5514/DA7219

Xing Zheng
2016-06-03T14:16:42Z

Hi Rob,

On 2016年06月01日 22:45, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 09:02:22PM +0800, Xing Zheng wrote:
>> There are multi codec devices on the RK3399 platform, we can use
>> this patch support and control these codecs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xing Zheng<zhengxing@rock-chips.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v3:
>> - rename DOC to rockchip,rk3399-max98357a-rt5514-da7219.txt
>> - rename compatible to rockchip,rk3399-max98357a-rt5514-da7219
>> - rename source code to rk3399_max98357a_rt5514_da7219.c
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - use the FS 256 to set mclks of the max98357a and rt5514 danamically
>> - add more sample rate for da7219
>>
>> .../rockchip,rk3399-max98357a-rt5514-da7219.txt | 15 +
>> sound/soc/rockchip/Kconfig | 11 +
>> sound/soc/rockchip/Makefile | 2 +
>> .../soc/rockchip/rk3399_max98357a_rt5514_da7219.c | 333 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 361 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/rockchip,rk3399-max98357a-rt5514-da7219.txt
>> create mode 100644 sound/soc/rockchip/rk3399_max98357a_rt5514_da7219.c
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/rockchip,rk3399-max98357a-rt5514-da7219.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/rockchip,rk3399-max98357a-rt5514-da7219.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..3ae603e
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/rockchip,rk3399-max98357a-rt5514-da7219.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
>> +ROCKCHIP with MAX98357A/RT5514/DA7219 codecs
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +- compatible: "rockchip,rk3399-max98357a-rt5514-da7219"
> I'm still not very clear on the naming convention thoughout this. This
> doesn't seem like a pattern we want to repeat (<chip>-<codec>-<codec>).
>
Thank you for your reply. :-)

I refered to MTK's mt8173-rt5650-rt5514.txt on upstream, that compatible
name is "mediatek,mt8173-rt5650-rt5514".
Because our platform need to support 3 codecs (max98357a / da7219 /
rt5514). Perhaps, you maybe feel that name is too long? And, could you
please tell me what names would be better?

For example: "rk3399-composite-codecs" ?

Thanks.

--
- Xing Zheng