From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH] Avoid buffer overflows in get_user_pages()
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:17:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5758.1202771853@vena.lwn.net> (raw)
Avoid buffer overflows in get_user_pages()
So I spent a while pounding my head against my monitor trying to figure
out the vmsplice() vulnerability - how could a failure to check for
*read* access turn into a root exploit? It turns out that it's a buffer
overflow problem which is made easy by the way get_user_pages() is
coded.
In particular, "len" is a signed int, and it is only checked at the
*end* of a do {} while() loop. So, if it is passed in as zero, the loop
will execute once and decrement len to -1. At that point, the loop will
proceed until the next invalid address is found; in the process, it will
likely overflow the pages array passed in to get_user_pages().
I think that, if get_user_pages() has been asked to grab zero pages,
that's what it should do. Thus this patch; it is, among other things,
enough to block the (already fixed) root exploit and any others which
might be lurking in similar code. I also think that the number of pages
should be unsigned, but changing the prototype of this function probably
requires some more careful review.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index e5628a5..7f50fd8 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -989,6 +989,8 @@ int get_user_pages(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
int i;
unsigned int vm_flags;
+ if (len <= 0)
+ return 0;
/*
* Require read or write permissions.
* If 'force' is set, we only require the "MAY" flags.
next reply other threads:[~2008-02-11 23:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-11 23:17 Jonathan Corbet [this message]
2008-02-11 23:45 ` [PATCH] Avoid buffer overflows in get_user_pages() Nick Piggin
2008-02-12 7:46 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-12 10:35 ` Jiri Kosina
2008-02-14 16:45 ` Oliver Pinter
2008-02-14 21:09 ` Jonathan Corbet
[not found] <fa.5jOFf0zR7ZoK3hLDItf3Omow4lE@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.NNs+hqAlLlf93+yNZ/YJzSyGQbs@ifi.uio.no>
2008-02-12 3:16 ` Robert Hancock
2008-02-12 5:56 ` Nick Piggin
[not found] <9VQ6w-5Xn-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <9VY4a-1tI-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
2008-02-12 8:34 ` Bodo Eggert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5758.1202771853@vena.lwn.net \
--to=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox