public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@samsung.com>
To: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Cc: ulf.hansson@linaro.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: remove UBSAN warning in dw_mci_setup_bus()
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 10:29:25 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <575A17F5.1050609@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5759633E.7090706@samsung.com>

Hi Jaehoon,

On 2016년 06월 09일 21:38, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> Hi Seung-Woo,
> 
> On 06/08/2016 01:07 PM, Seung-Woo Kim wrote:
>> This patch removes following UBSAN warnings in dw_mci_setup_bus().
>> The warnings are caused because of shift with more than 31 on 32
>> bit variable, so this patch fixes to shift only for less than 32.
>>
>>   UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c:1102:14
>>   shift exponent 250 is too large for 32-bit type 'unsigned int'
>>   Call trace:
>>   [<ffffff90080908a8>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x380
>>   [<ffffff9008090c3c>] show_stack+0x14/0x20
>>   [<ffffff90087457b8>] dump_stack+0xe0/0x120
>>   [<ffffff90087b1360>] ubsan_epilogue+0x18/0x68
>>   [<ffffff90087b1a94>] __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x18c/0x1bc
>>   [<ffffff9008d89cb8>] dw_mci_setup_bus+0x3a0/0x438
>>   [...]
>>
>>   UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c:1132:27
>>   shift exponent 250 is too large for 32-bit type 'unsigned int'
>>   Call trace:
>>   [<ffffff90080908a8>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x380
>>   [<ffffff9008090c3c>] show_stack+0x14/0x20
>>   [<ffffff90087457b8>] dump_stack+0xe0/0x120
>>   [<ffffff90087b1360>] ubsan_epilogue+0x18/0x68
>>   [<ffffff90087b1a94>] __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x18c/0x1bc
>>   [<ffffff9008d89c9c>] dw_mci_setup_bus+0x384/0x438
> 
> The below message can be discarded.

You are right, like above message, below part can be replaced as [...].

> 
>>   [<ffffff9008d89ed4>] dw_mci_set_ios+0x184/0x798
>>   [<ffffff9008d550ac>] mmc_power_up+0x11c/0x260
>>   [<ffffff9008d56b78>] mmc_start_host+0x88/0x100
>>   [<ffffff9008d583f4>] mmc_add_host+0x6c/0x128
>>   [<ffffff9008d88f90>] dw_mci_probe+0x1088/0x1750
>>   [<ffffff9008d8caa8>] dw_mci_pltfm_register+0x108/0x178
>>   [<ffffff9008d8dae4>] dw_mci_exynos_probe+0x4c/0x88
>>   [<ffffff9008a03838>] platform_drv_probe+0x78/0x180
>>   [<ffffff90089fe9fc>] driver_probe_device+0x144/0x460
>>   [<ffffff90089fee0c>] __driver_attach+0xf4/0x140
>>   [<ffffff90089fad98>] bus_for_each_dev+0xf0/0x160
>>   [<ffffff90089fdc9c>] driver_attach+0x34/0x58
>>   [<ffffff90089fd3e0>] bus_add_driver+0x2c0/0x398
>>   [<ffffff9008a00924>] driver_register+0xbc/0x1e0
>>   [<ffffff9008a02a94>] __platform_driver_register+0x84/0xa8
>>   [<ffffff9009dd5730>] dw_mci_exynos_pltfm_driver_init+0x18/0x20
>>   [<ffffff9008082df8>] do_one_initcall+0xa0/0x2c8
>>   [<ffffff9009d81780>] kernel_init_freeable+0x52c/0x5dc
>>   [<ffffff9009519844>] kernel_init+0x1c/0xf8
>>   [<ffffff9008086e10>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x40
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@samsung.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c |    5 +++--
>>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> index 2cc6123..dff045e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> @@ -1099,7 +1099,8 @@ static void dw_mci_setup_bus(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, bool force_clkinit)
>>  
>>  		div = (host->bus_hz != clock) ? DIV_ROUND_UP(div, 2) : 0;
>>  
>> -		if ((clock << div) != slot->__clk_old || force_clkinit)
>> +		if (((div < 32) ? (clock << div) : 0) != slot->__clk_old ||
> 
> Well, we don't expect that clock is 0.
> if clock is 0, it should be passed to " if (!clock)"..
> 
> During initializing card, clock is 400KHz or less..I understood what you want to fix.
> But I taught this is not correct.

It seems slot->__clk_old is not really clock but a kind of value to
store both clock and div in one variable. And at least, my compiler
calculates right shift with more than 32 as 0. I am not sure there is
other proper value for the case.

By the way, in my test environment, clock is calculated as like
following steps:
mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 200000000Hz (slot req 400000Hz,
actual 400000HZ div = 250)
mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 200000000Hz (slot req 200000000Hz,
actual 200000000HZ div = 0)
mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 200000000Hz (slot req 52000000Hz,
actual 50000000HZ div = 2)
mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 400000000Hz (slot req 52000000Hz,
actual 50000000HZ div = 4)
mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 400000000Hz (slot req 200000000Hz,
actual 200000000HZ div = 1)

and only the first case is reported as the warning. If you let me know
any proper value, then I will fix with the value.

Thanks,
- Seung-Woo Kim


> 
> 
>> +		    force_clkinit)
>>  			dev_info(&slot->mmc->class_dev,
>>  				 "Bus speed (slot %d) = %dHz (slot req %dHz, actual %dHZ div = %d)\n",
>>  				 slot->id, host->bus_hz, clock,
>> @@ -1129,7 +1130,7 @@ static void dw_mci_setup_bus(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, bool force_clkinit)
>>  		mci_send_cmd(slot, sdmmc_cmd_bits, 0);
>>  
>>  		/* keep the clock with reflecting clock dividor */
>> -		slot->__clk_old = clock << div;
>> +		slot->__clk_old = (div < 32) ? (clock << div) : 0;
> 
> Also, clock is not 0..
> 
> 
> Best Regards,
> Jaehoon Chung
> 
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	host->current_speed = clock;
>>
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Seung-Woo Kim
Samsung Software R&D Center
--

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-10  1:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20160608040654epcas1p2be228e3e02e35a640cb1e65228df79ad@epcas1p2.samsung.com>
2016-06-08  4:07 ` [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: remove UBSAN warning in dw_mci_setup_bus() Seung-Woo Kim
2016-06-09 12:38   ` Jaehoon Chung
2016-06-10  1:29     ` Seung-Woo Kim [this message]
2016-06-17  1:30       ` Jaehoon Chung
2016-06-17  4:07         ` Seung-Woo Kim
2016-06-17  5:16   ` [PATCH v2] " Seung-Woo Kim
2016-06-20  2:34     ` Jaehoon Chung
2016-06-20  3:30       ` Seung-Woo Kim
2016-06-20  3:45         ` Seung-Woo Kim
2016-06-20  4:09     ` [PATCH v3] " Seung-Woo Kim
2016-06-22  1:27       ` Jaehoon Chung

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=575A17F5.1050609@samsung.com \
    --to=sw0312.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox