From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932800AbcFJPbe (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jun 2016 11:31:34 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:39205 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932202AbcFJPbc (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jun 2016 11:31:32 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] arm64: errata: Calling enable functions for CPU errata too To: Andre Przywara , Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas References: <1462812590-4494-1-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> <1462812590-4494-5-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Suzuki K Poulose Message-ID: <575ADD50.2060109@arm.com> Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 16:31:28 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1462812590-4494-5-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/05/16 17:49, Andre Przywara wrote: > Currently we call the (optional) enable function for CPU _features_ > only. As CPU _errata_ descriptions share the same data structure and > having an enable function is useful for errata as well (for instance > to set bits in SCTLR), lets call it when enumerating erratas too. > > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara These changes look good to me. Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose Suzuki