Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Force per-CPU interrupt to be level-triggered

[David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>]

On 06/10/2016 12:29 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Jun 2016 14:10:48 -0700
> David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 06/06/2016 10:56 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> The ARM architected timer produces level-triggered interrupts (this
>>> is mandated by the architecture). Unfortunately, most device-trees
>>> get this wrong, and expose an edge-triggered interrupt.
>>>
>>> Until now, this wasn't too much an issue, as the programming of the
>>> trigger would fail (the corresponding PPI cannot be reconfigured),
>>> and the kernel would be happy with this. But we're about to change
>>> this, and trust DT a lot if the driver doesn't provide its own
>>> trigger information. In that context, the timer breaks badly.
>>>
>>> While we do need to fix the DTs, there is also some userspace out
>>> there (kvmtool) that generates the same kind of broken DT on the
>>> fly, and that will completely break with newer kernels.
>>>
>>> As a safety measure, and to keep buggy software alive as well as
>>> buying us some time to fix DTs all over the place, let's check
>>> what trigger configuration has been given us by the firmware.
>>> If this is not a level configuration, then we know that the
>>> DT/ACPI configuration is bust, and we pick some defaults which
>>> won't be worse than the existing setup.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>>
>>
>> I tried to test this patch, but there is a problem somewhere that I have
>> not yet tracked down.  On Cavium Thunder (gic-v3 based) I have tested
>> with the device tree interrupt type of both 4 and 8 and get the same result:
>>
>>
>> [    0.000000] arm_arch_timer: WARNING: Invalid trigger for IRQ2,
>> assuming level low
>> [    0.000000] arm_arch_timer: WARNING: Please fix your firmware
>> [    0.000000] arm_arch_timer: WARNING: Invalid trigger for IRQ3,
>> assuming level low
>> [    0.000000] arm_arch_timer: WARNING: Please fix your firmware
>> [    0.000000] arm_arch_timer: Architected cp15 timer(s) running at
>> 100.00MHz (phys).
>> [    0.000000] clocksource: arch_sys_counter: mask: 0xffffffffffffff
>> max_cycles: 0x171024e7e0, max_idle_ns: 440795205315 ns
>> [    0.000002] sched_clock: 56 bits at 100MHz, resolution 10ns, wraps
>> every 4398046511100ns
>>
>> It could be that the gic-v3 irq mapping code is broken.  I will try to
>> look into it, but there may be other fixes needed before we would
>> consider this patch to be an improvement.
>
> That's because the core kernel has other bugs which are going to be
> addressed in 4.8. So far, we cannot set the trigger of a per-cpu
> interrupt from the device tree, and we end-up with whatever is the
> default (edge). You can put whatever you want in the DT, it will be
> ignored.

Yes, after looking into it, I see what you mean.

>
> This series in preparation of these fixes landing in 4.8, where we'll
> be able to do the right thing, and will start noticing stupid things
> coming from the DT.
>

I don't object to the patch, but would suggest a couple of things:

o We need to test it *after* the irq configuration issues are corrected.

o The merging order be such that we never get the WARNING messages.

Thanks,
David.