public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	keyhaede@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nbd@nbd.name
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] net-next: mediatek: IRQ cleanups, fixes and grouping
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 11:51:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <576276A6.6040904@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5dbb935d-2d9a-48fe-79c7-8e8f57b27678@phrozen.org>

On 06/16/2016 11:44 AM, John Crispin wrote:
> On 16/06/2016 07:20, David Miller wrote:
>> From: John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>
>> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 16:58:46 +0200
>>
>>> This series contains 2 small code cleanups that are leftovers from the
>>> MIPS support. There is also a small fix that adds proper locking to the
>>> code accessing the IRQ registers. Without this fix we saw deadlocks caused
>>> by the last patch of the series, which adds IRQ grouping. The grouping
>>> feature allows us to use different IRQs for TX and RX. By doing so we can
>>> use affinity to let the SoC handle the IRQs on different cores.
>>
>> This patch series doesn't apply cleanly to the net-next tree, I get rejects
>> on patch #4.
>
> it depends on the series with the 11 fixes that i sent last week which
> is however in the net tree and not the next tree (i also still had the
> DQL hack in my tree). if i resend this at the start of the next rc1
> would you merge it into the net tree so that it becomes part of v4.8 ?

Well, it would rather require a merge of -net into -net-next then. But
that would be useful indeed.

Cheers,
Daniel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-16  9:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-15 14:58 [PATCH 0/4] net-next: mediatek: IRQ cleanups, fixes and grouping John Crispin
2016-06-15 14:58 ` [PATCH 1/4] net-next: mediatek: remove superfluous register reads John Crispin
2016-06-15 14:58 ` [PATCH 2/4] net-next: mediatek: don't use intermediate variables to store IRQ masks John Crispin
2016-06-15 14:58 ` [PATCH 3/4] net-next: mediatek: add IRQ locking John Crispin
2016-06-15 14:58 ` [PATCH 4/4] net-next: mediatek: add support for IRQ grouping John Crispin
2016-06-16  5:20 ` [PATCH 0/4] net-next: mediatek: IRQ cleanups, fixes and grouping David Miller
2016-06-16  9:44   ` John Crispin
2016-06-16  9:51     ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2016-06-17  0:27     ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=576276A6.6040904@iogearbox.net \
    --to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=john@phrozen.org \
    --cc=keyhaede@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=nbd@nbd.name \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox