From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754152AbcFPQKz (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:10:55 -0400
Received: from www381.your-server.de ([78.46.137.84]:41165 "EHLO
	www381.your-server.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751619AbcFPQKy (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:10:54 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: add spi_sync_single_transfer wrapper for single
 spi_transfer
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
References: <1466034046-718-1-git-send-email-andi.shyti@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Andi Shyti <andi@etezian.org>
From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Message-ID: <5762CF88.4060800@metafoo.de>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:10:48 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Icedove/38.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1466034046-718-1-git-send-email-andi.shyti@samsung.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Authenticated-Sender: lars@metafoo.de
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 06/16/2016 01:40 AM, Andi Shyti wrote:
> The spi_sync_single_transfer function calls spi_sync_transfer
> with a single spi_transfer element, instead of an array.

So, what's the advantage of using this as opposed to calling
spi_sync_transfer with a 1 for the number of transfers?