From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754680AbcFPQim (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:38:42 -0400
Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:45083 "EHLO foss.arm.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753962AbcFPQik (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:38:40 -0400
Message-ID: <5762D591.5090702@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 17:36:33 +0100
From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
CC: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com>,
        Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>,
        syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>,
        Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>,
        Dmitriy Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: allow building with kcov coverage on ARM64
References: <20160614175543.GA2468@leverpostej> <CAG_fn=X521a9uD1bthDZ-swO9hrfq=jE2C_LUvzkn6C_q5dBvA@mail.gmail.com> <20160615092509.GA3984@leverpostej> <20160615114438.GC3984@leverpostej> <CAG_fn=U7-fUnw1GLwBbmqGTxnOWf4QcTjTyP4mGAORfEuWt3Eg@mail.gmail.com> <20160615142550.GA7971@leverpostej> <576283B9.9050900@arm.com> <CAG_fn=X=LSEN2FS0rapgW1PEEqkDLcSXLdxeKa=5ya9g0GJ23A@mail.gmail.com> <20160616154412.GC31477@leverpostej> <20160616162531.GF18752@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20160616163258.GA1459@leverpostej> <CAG_fn=VQjzPCeVrCLaJPnB1y4yE5z+5JAyZJgmeDiJA_upsHfg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG_fn=VQjzPCeVrCLaJPnB1y4yE5z+5JAyZJgmeDiJA_upsHfg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 16/06/16 17:36, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 05:25:31PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>> I noticed that there was an ack on v1 form Marc Z that's missing in v2.
>>
>> I believe Marc's reply [1] was to v3 [2], it's just that the version was
>> missing form the subject, and discussions continued on v2 in the mean
>> time.

Ah, that's what happened...


> Yes, this is correct.
>>> Maybe it no longer applies, I can't tell, but I usually expect
>>> subsequent versions of a patch to include all the previously given acks
>>> (of course, if they still apply, sometimes a patch rewrite means
>>> dropping those tags).
>>
>> I guess the simplest thing to do is for Alexander to send a v4 with the
>> tags accumulated, assuming James's Tested-by is applicable to v3 with
>> the boot/Makefile hunk removed. James?

> I think it's safe to assume James's Tested-by is still valid, as
> boot/Makefile hunk did virtually nothing.

I agree!

> I'll send the new patch version now.


Thanks,

James