From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
To: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] memory: samsung/exynos-srom: make it explicitly non-modular
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 09:50:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5767A02B.4070401@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160617003748.12188-6-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
On 06/17/2016 02:37 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is:
>
> memory/samsung/Kconfig:config EXYNOS_SROM
> memory/samsung/Kconfig: bool "Exynos SROM controller driver" if COMPILE_TEST
>
> ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone.
>
> Lets remove the modular code that is essentially orphaned, so that
> when reading the driver there is no doubt it is builtin-only.
>
> We explicitly disallow a driver unbind, since that doesn't have a
> sensible use case anyway, and it allows us to drop the ".remove"
> code for non-modular drivers.
>
> Since module_platform_driver() uses the same init level priority as
> builtin_platform_driver() the init ordering remains unchanged with
> this commit.
>
> Also note that MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE is a no-op for non-modular code.
>
> We also delete the MODULE_LICENSE tag etc. since all that information
> is already contained at the top of the file in the comments.
>
> Cc: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
> ---
> drivers/memory/samsung/exynos-srom.c | 21 +++------------------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
Thanks, applied for v4.8.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-20 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-17 0:37 [PATCH 0/6] memory: remove modular usage from non-modular drivers Paul Gortmaker
2016-06-17 0:37 ` [PATCH 1/6] memory: atmel-sdramc: make it explicitly non-modular Paul Gortmaker
2016-06-17 7:30 ` Nicolas Ferre
2016-06-21 15:17 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-06-17 0:37 ` [PATCH 2/6] memory: mvebu-devbus: " Paul Gortmaker
2016-06-17 0:37 ` [PATCH 3/6] memory: omap-gpmc: " Paul Gortmaker
2016-06-17 7:26 ` Roger Quadros
2016-06-17 0:37 ` [PATCH 4/6] memory: tegra20-mc: " Paul Gortmaker
2016-06-17 0:37 ` [PATCH 5/6] memory: samsung/exynos-srom: " Paul Gortmaker
2016-06-20 7:50 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2016-06-17 0:37 ` [PATCH 6/6] memory: atmel-ebi: " Paul Gortmaker
2016-06-17 7:35 ` Nicolas Ferre
2016-06-17 7:38 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-21 15:18 ` Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5767A02B.4070401@samsung.com \
--to=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pankaj.dubey@samsung.com \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox