From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
To: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com>
Cc: Pawel Osciak <pawel@osciak.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
linux-media <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>,
Dimitrios Katsaros <patcherwork@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vb2: V4L2_BUF_FLAG_DONE is set after DQBUF
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 12:17:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5767C2B4.6010908@xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPybu_251cQ7xiHm4Lb71iTE+79LfgLmP6jhaKEzwgAcvv9sJQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/20/2016 12:12 PM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
> Good catch :)
>
> I will prepare the new version. Btw, can I also merge
> vb2_internal_dqbuf and vb2_dqbuf in one function? Seems a bit
> overkilled that split.
No, that's not possible. vb2_internal_dqbuf is used in the threading
code to implement read() and vb2_fileio_is_active() returns true in that
case.
>
> Regarding v42l_compliance... I can take care of that if you dare :)
It would be great if you can add a test for this.
Regards,
Hans
>
> Best regards!
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>> On 06/20/2016 11:01 AM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
>>> According to the doc, V4L2_BUF_FLAG_DONE is cleared after DQBUF:
>>>
>>> V4L2_BUF_FLAG_DONE 0x00000004 ... After calling the VIDIOC_QBUF or
>>> VIDIOC_DQBUF it is always cleared ...
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, it seems that videobuf2 keeps it set after DQBUF. This
>>> can be tested with vivid and dev_debug:
>>>
>>> [257604.338082] video1: VIDIOC_DQBUF: 71:33:25.00260479 index=3,
>>> type=vid-cap, flags=0x00002004, field=none, sequence=163,
>>> memory=userptr, bytesused=460800, offset/userptr=0x344b000,
>>> length=460800
>>>
>>> This patch changes the order when fill_user_buffer() is called,
>>> to follow the documentation.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Dimitrios Katsaros <patcherwork@gmail.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com>
>>
>> Sorry, this won't work. Calling __vb2_dqbuf will overwrite the state
>> VB2_BUF_STATE_ERROR and so the V4L2_BUF_FLAG_ERROR flag will never be
>> set. The same is true for the last 'if' in the __fill_v4l2_buffer()
>> function.
>>
>> I think it might be better to keep this code and instead change the
>> vb2_internal_dqbuf function to just clear the DONE flag after calling
>> vb2_core_dqbuf.
>>
>> It would be nice to have a v4l2_compliance check for this as well.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hans
>>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c | 8 ++++----
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c
>>> index 633fc1ab1d7a..63981f28075e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c
>>> @@ -1771,10 +1771,6 @@ int vb2_core_dqbuf(struct vb2_queue *q, unsigned int *pindex, void *pb,
>>> if (pindex)
>>> *pindex = vb->index;
>>>
>>> - /* Fill buffer information for the userspace */
>>> - if (pb)
>>> - call_void_bufop(q, fill_user_buffer, vb, pb);
>>> -
>>> /* Remove from videobuf queue */
>>> list_del(&vb->queued_entry);
>>> q->queued_count--;
>>> @@ -1784,6 +1780,10 @@ int vb2_core_dqbuf(struct vb2_queue *q, unsigned int *pindex, void *pb,
>>> /* go back to dequeued state */
>>> __vb2_dqbuf(vb);
>>>
>>> + /* Fill buffer information for the userspace */
>>> + if (pb)
>>> + call_void_bufop(q, fill_user_buffer, vb, pb);
>>> +
>>> dprintk(1, "dqbuf of buffer %d, with state %d\n",
>>> vb->index, vb->state);
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-20 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-20 9:01 [PATCH] vb2: V4L2_BUF_FLAG_DONE is set after DQBUF Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2016-06-20 9:53 ` Hans Verkuil
2016-06-20 10:12 ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2016-06-20 10:17 ` Hans Verkuil [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5767C2B4.6010908@xs4all.nl \
--to=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=hans.verkuil@cisco.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=patcherwork@gmail.com \
--cc=pawel@osciak.com \
--cc=ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox