From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
Benjamin Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched,fair: Fix PELT integrity for new tasks
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 15:49:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5768027E.1090408@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtBB3jyOWrv8=+S2zRXD+pSXPWgoZ3aJUscE5yJDpkDmzw@mail.gmail.com>
On 20/06/16 13:35, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 20 June 2016 at 13:35, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 17/06/16 17:18, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 06:02:39PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>>> So yes, ho-humm, how to go about doing that bestest. Lemme have a play.
>>>
>>> This is what I came up with, not entirely pretty, but I suppose it'll
>>> have to do.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>>> @@ -724,6 +724,7 @@ void post_init_entity_util_avg(struct sc
>>> struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
>>> struct sched_avg *sa = &se->avg;
>>> long cap = (long)(SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE - cfs_rq->avg.util_avg) / 2;
>>> + u64 now = cfs_rq_clock_task(cfs_rq);
>>>
>>> if (cap > 0) {
>>> if (cfs_rq->avg.util_avg != 0) {
>>> @@ -738,7 +739,20 @@ void post_init_entity_util_avg(struct sc
>>> sa->util_sum = sa->util_avg * LOAD_AVG_MAX;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - update_cfs_rq_load_avg(cfs_rq_clock_task(cfs_rq), cfs_rq, false);
>>> + if (entity_is_task(se)) {
>>> + struct task_struct *p = task_of(se);
>>> + if (p->sched_class != &fair_sched_class) {
>>> + /*
>>> + * For !fair tasks do attach_entity_load_avg()
>>> + * followed by detach_entity_load_avg() as per
>>> + * switched_from_fair().
>>> + */
>>> + se->avg.last_update_time = now;
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + update_cfs_rq_load_avg(now, cfs_rq, false);
>>> attach_entity_load_avg(cfs_rq, se);
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Doesn't a sleeping !fair_sched_class task which switches to fair uses
>> try_to_wake_up() rather than wake_up_new_task() so it won't go through
>> post_init_entity_util_avg()?
>
> It will go through wake_up_new_task and post_init_entity_util_avg
> during its fork which is enough to set last_update_time. Then, it will
> use the switched_to_fair if the task becomes a fair one
Oh I see. We want to make sure that every task (even when forked as
!fair) has a last_update_time value != 0, when becoming fair one day.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-20 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-17 12:01 [PATCH 0/4] sched/fair: Fix PELT wobblies Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-17 12:01 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched: Optimize fork() paths Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-17 12:01 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched/fair: Fix PELT integrity for new groups Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-17 13:51 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-06-17 12:01 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched,cgroup: Fix cpu_cgroup_fork() Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-17 13:58 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-06-17 14:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-17 12:01 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched,fair: Fix PELT integrity for new tasks Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-17 14:09 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-06-17 14:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-17 16:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-17 16:14 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-06-17 16:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-19 22:55 ` Yuyang Du
2016-06-20 9:23 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-06-20 9:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-20 10:07 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-06-21 11:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-21 12:36 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-06-21 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-21 12:56 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-06-20 11:35 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-06-20 12:35 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-06-20 14:49 ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2016-06-21 8:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-21 4:51 ` Yuyang Du
2016-06-24 13:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-09 23:19 ` Yuyang Du
2016-06-21 13:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-21 13:29 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-06-22 11:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-23 15:35 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-06-23 17:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-20 14:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-23 11:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-01 7:30 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-08-01 9:31 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-08-01 9:56 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-08-01 11:52 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5768027E.1090408@arm.com \
--to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=yuyang.du@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox