From: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
tglx@linutronix.de, jason@lakedaemon.net, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
bhelgaas@google.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com, shijie.huang@arm.com,
Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com
Cc: al.stone@linaro.org, mw@semihalf.com, graeme.gregory@linaro.org,
Catalin.Marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, ddaney.cavm@gmail.com,
okaya@codeaurora.org, andrea.gallo@linaro.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 1/8] ACPI: I/O Remapping Table (IORT) initial support
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 13:06:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <576A711D.5080206@semihalf.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <576A6D7F.6010407@arm.com>
On 22.06.2016 12:50, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 21/06/16 08:12, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> Hi Tomasz,
>>
>> Sorry for jumping out late, just one comment below.
>>
>> On 2016/6/20 19:02, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
>>> IORT shows representation of IO topology for ARM based systems.
>>> It describes how various components are connected together on
>>> parent-child basis e.g. PCI RC -> SMMU -> ITS. Also see IORT spec.
>>>
>>> Initial support allows to detect IORT table presence and save its
>>> root pointer obtained through acpi_get_table(). The pointer validity
>>> depends on acpi_gbl_permanent_mmap because if acpi_gbl_permanent_mmap
>>> is not set while using IORT nodes we would dereference unmapped pointers.
>>>
>>> For the aforementioned reason call iort_table_detect() from acpi_init()
>>> which guarantees acpi_gbl_permanent_mmap to be set at that point.
>>>
>>> Add generic helpers which are helpful for scanning and retrieving
>>> information from IORT table content. List of the most important helpers:
>>> - iort_find_dev_node() finds IORT node for a given device
>>> - iort_node_map_rid() maps device RID and returns IORT node which provides
>>> final translation
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 3 +
>>> drivers/acpi/Makefile | 1 +
>>> drivers/acpi/bus.c | 2 +
>>> drivers/acpi/iort.c | 220 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> include/linux/iort.h | 30 +++++++
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> +static acpi_status
>>> +iort_match_node_callback(struct acpi_iort_node *node, void *context)
>>> +{
>>> + struct device *dev = context;
>>> +
>>> + switch (node->type) {
>>> + case ACPI_IORT_NODE_NAMED_COMPONENT: {
>>> + struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
>>
>> ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER is used here, so ...
>>
>>> + struct acpi_device *adev = to_acpi_device_node(dev->fwnode);
>>> + struct acpi_iort_named_component *ncomp;
>>> +
>>> + if (!adev)
>>> + break;
>>> +
>>> + ncomp = (struct acpi_iort_named_component *)node->node_data;
>>> +
>>> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_get_name(adev->handle,
>>> + ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer))) {
>>> + dev_warn(dev, "Can't get device full path name\n");
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (!strcmp(ncomp->device_name, (char *)buffer.pointer))
>>> + return AE_OK;
>>
>> ... we need to kfree(buffer.pointer) before we return or break.
>
> For the record, I've queued this patch on top:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/iort.c
> index 496dcf6..3b9e55b 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/iort.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/iort.c
> @@ -158,11 +158,15 @@ iort_match_node_callback(struct acpi_iort_node *node, void *context)
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_get_name(adev->handle,
> ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer))) {
> dev_warn(dev, "Can't get device full path name\n");
> - break;
> - }
> + } else {
> + int match;
>
> - if (!strcmp(ncomp->device_name, (char *)buffer.pointer))
> - return AE_OK;
> + match = !strcmp(ncomp->device_name, buffer.pointer);
> + acpi_os_free(&buffer);
> +
> + if (match)
> + return AE_OK;
> + }
>
> break;
> }
>
>
> assuming that Rafael is OK with the general approach, of course.
>
Thanks Marc. As Lorenzo pointed out, we need another fix for
iort_node_map_rid(). Do you want me to refresh the whole series or this
patch only?
Tomasz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-22 11:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-20 11:02 [PATCH V7 0/8] Introduce ACPI world to ITS irqchip Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-20 11:02 ` [PATCH V7 1/8] ACPI: I/O Remapping Table (IORT) initial support Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-21 7:12 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-06-22 10:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-06-22 11:06 ` Tomasz Nowicki [this message]
2016-06-22 12:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-06-21 11:23 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-06-21 17:36 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-06-22 12:35 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-22 12:40 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-22 13:25 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-06-22 13:52 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-22 14:51 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-06-23 1:34 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-07-26 13:19 ` Christopher Covington
2016-07-26 14:48 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-06-20 11:02 ` [PATCH V7 2/8] ACPI: Add new IORT functions to support MSI domain handling Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-21 7:28 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-06-20 11:02 ` [PATCH V7 3/8] PCI/MSI: Setup MSI domain on a per-device basis using IORT ACPI table Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-21 7:33 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-07-19 21:42 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-06-20 11:02 ` [PATCH V7 4/8] irqchip/gicv3-its: Cleanup for ITS domain initialization Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-21 7:44 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-06-20 11:02 ` [PATCH V7 5/8] irqchip/gicv3-its: Refactor ITS DT init code to prepare for ACPI Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-20 11:02 ` [PATCH V7 6/8] irqchip/gicv3-its: Probe ITS in the ACPI way Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-21 8:03 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-06-20 11:02 ` [PATCH V7 7/8] irqchip/gicv3-its: Factor out code that might be reused for ACPI Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-20 11:02 ` [PATCH V7 8/8] irqchip/gicv3-its: Use MADT ITS subtable to do PCI/MSI domain initialization Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-21 8:19 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-06-20 17:31 ` [PATCH V7 0/8] Introduce ACPI world to ITS irqchip Shanker Donthineni
2016-06-24 11:04 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-08-09 10:45 ` Robert Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=576A711D.5080206@semihalf.com \
--to=tn@semihalf.com \
--cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
--cc=Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=al.stone@linaro.org \
--cc=andrea.gallo@linaro.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=ddaney.cavm@gmail.com \
--cc=graeme.gregory@linaro.org \
--cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mw@semihalf.com \
--cc=okaya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=shijie.huang@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).