From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752651AbcFVRpV (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2016 13:45:21 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:49624 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751235AbcFVRpT (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2016 13:45:19 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] ACPI / processor_idle: Add ACPI v6.0 LPI support To: "Rafael J . Wysocki" References: <1465915719-8409-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Sudeep Holla , Vikas Sajjan , Sunil , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Prashanth Prakash , Al Stone , Ashwin Chaugule , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Sudeep Holla Organization: ARM Message-ID: <576ACEAB.6050306@arm.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 18:45:15 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1465915719-8409-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Rafael, On 14/06/16 15:48, Sudeep Holla wrote: > ACPI 6.0 introduced LPI(Low Power Idle) states that provides an alternate > method to describe processor idle states. It extends the specification > to allow the expression of idle states like C-states selectable by the > OSPM when a processor goes idle, but may affect more than one processor, > and may affect other system components. > > LPI extensions leverages the processor container device(again introduced > in ACPI 6.0) allowing to express which parts of the system are affected > by a given LPI state. It defines the local power states for each node > in a hierarchical processor topology. The OSPM can use _LPI object to > select a local power state for each level of processor hierarchy in the > system. They used to produce a composite power state request that is > presented to the platform by the OSPM. > > Since multiple processors affect the idle state for any non-leaf hierarchy > node, coordination of idle state requests between the processors is > required. ACPI supports two different coordination schemes: Platform > coordinated and OS initiated. > > This series aims at providing basic and initial support for platform > coordinated LPI states. > Gentle ping, was hoping to target this series for v4.8 -- Regards, Sudeep