Re: [PATCH v10 loongarch-next 3/3] LoongArch: Replace seq_printf with seq_puts for simple strings

[Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>]

On Sat, 2026-01-10 at 21:11 +0800, George Guo wrote:
> Fix warnings like: "Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf" by checkpatch.pl.
> 
> Replace seq_printf() calls with seq_puts() in show_cpuinfo()
> when outputting simple constant strings without format specifiers.
> 
> This improves performance slightly as seq_puts() avoids parsing
> the format string.
[]
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/proc.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/proc.c
[]
> @@ -50,33 +50,49 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
[]
> -	seq_printf(m, "Features\t\t:");
> -	if (cpu_has_cpucfg)	seq_printf(m, " cpucfg");
> -	if (cpu_has_lam)	seq_printf(m, " lam");
[etc]
> +	seq_puts(m, "Features\t\t:");
> +	if (cpu_has_cpucfg)
> +		seq_puts(m, " cpucfg");
> +	if (cpu_has_lam)
> +		seq_puts(m, " lam");

trivia:

Not sure this is better style as it's fairly difficult to read.

Maybe a macro might help, something like:

#define seq_cpu_feature(m, feature) \
	if (cpu_has_##feature) seq_puts(m, " " #feature)

	seq_cpu_feature(m, cpucfg);
	seq_cpu_feature(m, lam);

etc.