From: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>,
Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@gmail.com>,
Karunika Choo <karunika.choo@arm.com>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Cc: kernel@collabora.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/4] drm/panthor: Add gpu_job_irq tracepoint
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2026 12:49:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5773030.GXAFRqVoOG@workhorse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0772b791-85ad-4eb0-8c71-daeae74f0b79@arm.com>
On Friday, 9 January 2026 17:23:32 Central European Standard Time Steven Price wrote:
> On 08/01/2026 14:19, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote:
> > Mali's CSF firmware triggers the job IRQ whenever there's new firmware
> > events for processing. While this can be a global event (BIT(31) of the
> > status register), it's usually an event relating to a command stream
> > group (the other bit indices).
> >
> > Panthor throws these events onto a workqueue for processing outside the
> > IRQ handler. It's therefore useful to have an instrumented tracepoint
> > that goes beyond the generic IRQ tracepoint for this specific case, as
> > it can be augmented with additional data, namely the events bit mask.
> >
> > This can then be used to debug problems relating to GPU jobs events not
> > being processed quickly enough. The duration_ns field can be used to
> > work backwards from when the tracepoint fires (at the end of the IRQ
> > handler) to figure out when the interrupt itself landed, providing not
> > just information on how long the work queueing took, but also when the
> > actual interrupt itself arrived.
> >
> > With this information in hand, the IRQ handler itself being slow can be
> > excluded as a possible source of problems, and attention can be directed
> > to the workqueue processing instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_fw.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_trace.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_fw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_fw.c
> > index 0e46625f7621..b3b48c1b049c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_fw.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_fw.c
> > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> > #include "panthor_mmu.h"
> > #include "panthor_regs.h"
> > #include "panthor_sched.h"
> > +#include "panthor_trace.h"
> >
> > #define CSF_FW_NAME "mali_csffw.bin"
> >
> > @@ -1060,6 +1061,12 @@ static void panthor_fw_init_global_iface(struct panthor_device *ptdev)
> >
> > static void panthor_job_irq_handler(struct panthor_device *ptdev, u32 status)
> > {
> > + u32 duration;
> > + u64 start;
> > +
> > + if (tracepoint_enabled(gpu_job_irq))
> > + start = ktime_get_ns();
> > +
> > gpu_write(ptdev, JOB_INT_CLEAR, status);
> >
> > if (!ptdev->fw->booted && (status & JOB_INT_GLOBAL_IF))
> > @@ -1072,6 +1079,12 @@ static void panthor_job_irq_handler(struct panthor_device *ptdev, u32 status)
> > return;
> >
> > panthor_sched_report_fw_events(ptdev, status);
> > +
> > + if (tracepoint_enabled(gpu_job_irq)) {
> > + if (check_sub_overflow(ktime_get_ns(), start, &duration))
>
> It's minor but if the tracepoint was enabled during the handler, the
> duration will use start uninitialised. It's probably best to initialise
> start just to avoid a potential stack leak.
Good catch.
Should I unconditionally initialize it to ktime_get_ns(), or do we want
to avoid a call into that and initialize it to something that will result
in a nonsense duration? Alternatively we initialize it to 0 and skip the
tracepoint if !start.
My gut tells me reading the monotonic clock shouldn't be considered
expensive, though having the tracepoint overhead with an inactive
tracepoint be within a Planck time of "free" would be preferable,
so I'm leaning towards
u64 start = 0;
if (tracepoint_enabled(gpu_job_irq))
start = ktime_get_ns();
...
if (start && tracepoint_enabled(gpu_job_irq)) {
...
Kind regards,
Nicolas Frattaroli
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
> > + duration = U32_MAX;
> > + trace_gpu_job_irq(ptdev->base.dev, status, duration);
> > + }
> > }
> > PANTHOR_IRQ_HANDLER(job, JOB, panthor_job_irq_handler);
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_trace.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_trace.h
> > index 5bd420894745..6ffeb4fe6599 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_trace.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_trace.h
> > @@ -48,6 +48,34 @@ TRACE_EVENT_FN(gpu_power_status,
> > panthor_hw_power_status_register, panthor_hw_power_status_unregister
> > );
> >
> > +/**
> > + * gpu_job_irq - called after a job interrupt from firmware completes
> > + * @dev: pointer to the &struct device, for printing the device name
> > + * @events: bitmask of BIT(CSG id) | BIT(31) for a global event
> > + * @duration_ns: Nanoseconds between job IRQ handler entry and exit
> > + *
> > + * The panthor_job_irq_handler() function instrumented by this tracepoint exits
> > + * once it has queued the firmware interrupts for processing, not when the
> > + * firmware interrupts are fully processed. This tracepoint allows for debugging
> > + * issues with delays in the workqueue's processing of events.
> > + */
> > +TRACE_EVENT(gpu_job_irq,
> > + TP_PROTO(const struct device *dev, u32 events, u32 duration_ns),
> > + TP_ARGS(dev, events, duration_ns),
> > + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> > + __string(dev_name, dev_name(dev))
> > + __field(u32, events)
> > + __field(u32, duration_ns)
> > + ),
> > + TP_fast_assign(
> > + __assign_str(dev_name);
> > + __entry->events = events;
> > + __entry->duration_ns = duration_ns;
> > + ),
> > + TP_printk("%s: events=0x%x duration_ns=%d", __get_str(dev_name),
> > + __entry->events, __entry->duration_ns)
> > +);
> > +
> > #endif /* __PANTHOR_TRACE_H__ */
> >
> > #undef TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH
> >
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-11 11:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-08 14:19 [PATCH v7 0/4] Add a few tracepoints to panthor Nicolas Frattaroli
2026-01-08 14:19 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] drm/panthor: Extend IRQ helpers for mask modification/restoration Nicolas Frattaroli
2026-01-09 15:59 ` Steven Price
2026-01-11 11:39 ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2026-01-08 14:19 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] drm/panthor: Rework panthor_irq::suspended into panthor_irq::state Nicolas Frattaroli
2026-01-09 16:05 ` Steven Price
2026-01-12 13:39 ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2026-01-12 14:09 ` Steven Price
2026-01-08 14:19 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] drm/panthor: Add tracepoint for hardware utilisation changes Nicolas Frattaroli
2026-01-08 14:19 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] drm/panthor: Add gpu_job_irq tracepoint Nicolas Frattaroli
2026-01-09 16:23 ` Steven Price
2026-01-11 11:49 ` Nicolas Frattaroli [this message]
2026-01-12 9:15 ` Steven Price
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5773030.GXAFRqVoOG@workhorse \
--to=nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=karunika.choo@arm.com \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=olvaffe@gmail.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox