From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752795AbcF3Qqi (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jun 2016 12:46:38 -0400 Received: from www.sr71.net ([198.145.64.142]:34784 "EHLO blackbird.sr71.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752220AbcF3Qqg (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jun 2016 12:46:36 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] [v3] System Calls for Memory Protection Keys To: Ingo Molnar References: <20160609000117.71AC7623@viggo.jf.intel.com> <20160630094123.GA29268@gmail.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, arnd@arndb.de, Al Viro , Mel Gorman , Hugh Dickins From: Dave Hansen Message-ID: <57754CEA.6070900@sr71.net> Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 09:46:34 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160630094123.GA29268@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/30/2016 02:41 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Dave Hansen wrote: >> Are there any concerns with merging these into the x86 tree so >> that they go upstream for 4.8? The updates here are pretty >> minor. > >> include/linux/pkeys.h | 39 +- >> include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h | 5 + >> include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h | 12 +- >> mm/mprotect.c | 134 +- > > So I'd love to have some high level MM review & ack for these syscall ABI > extensions. That's a quite reasonable request, but I'm really surprised by it at this point. The proposed ABI is one very straightforward extension to one existing system call, plus four others that you personally suggested. They haven't *changed* since last November: http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1511.2/00985.html I see you added Mel and Hugh to the cc. Is that who you'd like to see review it? Is there anyone else? I'd expect Mel and Hugh's review time to be highly contended, and I'd rather not gate these on them. If it helps anyone review these more easily, I've html-ized the affected manpages and published them: https://www.sr71.net/~dave/intel/manpages/