From: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: <luto@kernel.org>, <mingo@kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Cong Wang <cwang@twopensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] notifier: Fix soft lockup for notifier_call_chain().
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 11:06:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5775DE23.40101@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1467095271.6850.192.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
On 2016/6/28 14:27, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-28 at 08:22 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>> Follow the stack trace and add another cond_resched() where it is needed
>> then ?
>>
>> Lot of this code was written decade ago where nobody expected a root
>> user was going to try hard to crash its host ;)
>>
>> I did not check if the following is valid (Maybe __fib6_clean_all() is
>> called with some spinlock/rwlock held)
>
> Well, fib6_run_gc() can call it with
> spin_lock_bh(&net->ipv6.fib6_gc_lock) so this wont work.
>
> We need more invasive changes.
>
>
>
Hi Eric:
I debug this problem, and found that the __fib6_clean_all() would not hold the cpu more than 1 second event though there
is a lot of ipv6 address to deal with, but the notifier_chian would call the ipv6 notifier several times and hold the cpu
for a long time, so add cond_resched() in the addrconf_ifdown could solve the problem correctly, I think your first solution
is the good way to fix this bug.
Thanks
Ding
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-01 3:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-28 4:56 [PATCH v2] notifier: Fix soft lockup for notifier_call_chain() Ding Tianhong
2016-06-28 5:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-06-28 6:09 ` Ding Tianhong
2016-06-28 6:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-06-28 6:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-07-01 3:06 ` Ding Tianhong [this message]
2016-07-01 5:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-06-28 17:33 ` Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5775DE23.40101@huawei.com \
--to=dingtianhong@huawei.com \
--cc=cwang@twopensource.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox