From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932226AbcGAOrh (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 1 Jul 2016 10:47:37 -0400
Received: from b.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.144]:44725 "EHLO radon.swed.at"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752540AbcGAOrg (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 1 Jul 2016 10:47:36 -0400
Subject: Re: [RFC] WireGuard: next generation secure network tunnel
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
References: <CAHmME9q-6ioctzcB8gLdYOsMFqHVGY8GUsVGFisKv=wGdVqi2A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFLxGvzk5NywJou_g9_z6JQUrvcTNsAUPXt4R6AdS9nmRqYwcw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHmME9opjoOYQBacomKBMXMPkch8fxSjFp1B_uoPFFmQeLh24g@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Message-ID: <5776827F.8010306@nod.at>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 16:47:27 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHmME9opjoOYQBacomKBMXMPkch8fxSjFp1B_uoPFFmQeLh24g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Jason,

Am 01.07.2016 um 16:25 schrieb Jason A. Donenfeld:
> Hi Richard,
> 
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Richard Weinberger
> <richard.weinberger@gmail.com> wrote:
>> So every logical tunnel will allocate a new net device?
>> Doesn't this scale badly? I have ipsec alike setups
>> with many, many road warriors in mind.
> 
> No, this isn't the case. Each net device has multiple peers. Check out
> the example config on the website, pasted here for convenience:
> 
>> [Interface]
>> PrivateKey = yAnz5TF+lXXJte14tji3zlMNq+hd2rYUIgJBgB3fBmk=
>> ListenPort = 41414
>>
>> [Peer]
>> PublicKey = xTIBA5rboUvnH4htodjb6e697QjLERt1NAB4mZqp8Dg=
>> AllowedIPs = 10.192.122.3/32, 10.192.124.1/24
>>
>> [Peer]
>> PublicKey = TrMvSoP4jYQlY6RIzBgbssQqY3vxI2Pi+y71lOWWXX0=
>> AllowedIPs = 10.192.122.4/32, 192.168.0.0/16
>>
>> [Peer]
>> PublicKey = gN65BkIKy1eCE9pP1wdc8ROUtkHLF2PfAqYdyYBz6EA=
>> AllowedIPs = 10.10.10.230/32
> 
> If that file is example.conf, you could set up a single device like this:
> 
> $ ip link add dev wg0 type wireguard
> $ wg setconf wg0 example.conf
> 
> That single netdev is now configured to communicate with several peers.
> 
> I hope this clarifies things. Let me know if you have further questions.

Yes. Makes sense. :-)

Thanks,
//richard