linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
To: Neo Jia <cjia@nvidia.com>
Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	"Kirti Wankhede" <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
	"Andrea Arcangeli" <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: MMU: support VMAs that got remap_pfn_range-ed
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 09:19:40 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <577B0B2C.8010300@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160704153303.GA18357@nvidia.com>



On 07/04/2016 11:33 PM, Neo Jia wrote:

>>>
>>> Sorry, I think I misread the "allocation" as "mapping". We only delay the
>>> cpu mapping, not the allocation.
>>
>> So how to understand your statement:
>> "at that moment nobody has any knowledge about how the physical mmio gets virtualized"
>>
>> The resource, physical MMIO region, has been allocated, why we do not know the physical
>> address mapped to the VM?
>>
>
>>From a device driver point of view, the physical mmio region never gets allocated until
> the corresponding resource is requested by clients and granted by the mediated device driver.

Hmm... but you told me that you did not delay the allocation. :(

So it returns to my original question: why not allocate the physical mmio region in mmap()?

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-05  1:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-30 13:01 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: MMU: support VMAs that got remap_pfn_range-ed Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-30 13:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: MMU: prepare to support mapping of VM_IO and VM_PFNMAP frames Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-30 13:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: MMU: try to fix up page faults before giving up Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-30 21:59 ` [PATCH 0/2] KVM: MMU: support VMAs that got remap_pfn_range-ed Neo Jia
2016-07-04  6:39 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-07-04  7:03   ` Neo Jia
2016-07-04  7:37     ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-07-04  7:48       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-04  7:59         ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-07-04  8:14           ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-04  8:21             ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-07-04  8:48               ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-04  7:53       ` Neo Jia
2016-07-04  8:19         ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-07-04  8:41           ` Neo Jia
2016-07-04  8:45             ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-07-04  8:54               ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-07-04  9:16               ` Neo Jia
2016-07-04 10:16                 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-07-04 15:33                   ` Neo Jia
2016-07-05  1:19                     ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2016-07-05  1:35                       ` Neo Jia
2016-07-05  4:02                         ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-07-05  5:16                           ` Neo Jia
2016-07-05  6:26                             ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-07-05  7:30                               ` Neo Jia
2016-07-05  9:02                                 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-07-05 15:07                                   ` Neo Jia
2016-07-06  2:22                                     ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-07-06  4:01                                       ` Neo Jia
2016-07-04  7:38   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-04  7:40     ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-07-05  5:41 ` Neo Jia
2016-07-05 12:18   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-05 14:02     ` Neo Jia
2016-07-06  2:00     ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-07-06  2:18       ` Neo Jia
2016-07-06  2:35         ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-07-06  2:57           ` Neo Jia
2016-07-06  4:02             ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-07-06 11:48               ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-07  2:36                 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-07-06  6:05       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-06 15:50         ` Alex Williamson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=577B0B2C.8010300@linux.intel.com \
    --to=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=cjia@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).