public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
To: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com, javier@osg.samsung.com,
	pankaj.dubey@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] rtc: s3c: Remove unnecessary call to disable already disabled clock
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 10:50:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <577B74E8.3010208@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <577B73FE.1020509@samsung.com>

On 07/05/2016 10:46 AM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> Hi Krzsztof,
> 
> On 07/05/2016 12:48 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 07/04/2016 01:03 PM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>>> At the end of s3c_rtc_probe(), s3c_rtc_disable_clk() being called
>>> with rtc
>>> clock already disabled, which looks extra and unnecessary call.
>>> Lets clean it up.
>>
>> Does not look right. Till that place, the clocks are enabled. Then
>> s3c_rtc_setaie() is called which expects that clocks are disabled...
>> otherwise counters get mixed.
>>
> 
> The clock is always disabled when it reach s3c_rtc_setfreq() in probe(),
> because s3c_rtc_gettime() will always disable the clock.
> 
> As far as s3c_rtc_setaie() is concern, it enables clock while entering
> and disables it while leaving the function. And in
> s3c_rtc_{enable,disable}_clk() there is check info->clk_disabled flag
> which will make sure clock balancing.

Ah, you're right. Looks correct although the information that clock is
disabled because of s3c_rtc_gettime() would be useful in the commit message.

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>

Best regards,
Krzysztof

      reply	other threads:[~2016-07-05  8:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-04 11:03 [RFC PATCH 1/2] rtc: s3c: Remove unnecessary call to disable already disabled clock Alim Akhtar
2016-07-04 11:03 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] rtc: s3c: Add s3c_rtc_{enable/disable}_clk in s3c_rtc_setfreq() Alim Akhtar
2016-07-05  8:16   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-07-05  8:52     ` Alim Akhtar
2016-07-05  8:56       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-07-05  9:43         ` pankaj.dubey
2016-07-05  9:44       ` pankaj.dubey
2016-07-05  7:18 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] rtc: s3c: Remove unnecessary call to disable already disabled clock Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-07-05  8:46   ` Alim Akhtar
2016-07-05  8:50     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=577B74E8.3010208@samsung.com \
    --to=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=javier@osg.samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pankaj.dubey@samsung.com \
    --cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox