From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754685AbcGFQ5H (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2016 12:57:07 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:2255 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753917AbcGFQ5F (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2016 12:57:05 -0400 X-IBM-Helo: d06dlp01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com X-IBM-MailFrom: borntraeger@de.ibm.com X-IBM-RcptTo: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] implement vcpu preempted check To: Peter Zijlstra , Juergen Gross References: <1467124991-13164-1-git-send-email-xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160706065255.GH30909@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <577CB786.8000902@suse.com> <20160706081920.GG30921@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Cc: Pan Xinhui , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, paulus@samba.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, waiman.long@hpe.com, will.deacon@arm.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com, dave@stgolabs.net, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, xen-devel-request@lists.xenproject.org, Martin Schwidefsky From: Christian Borntraeger Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 18:56:52 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160706081920.GG30921@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 16070616-0036-0000-0000-000001FBA939 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 16070616-0037-0000-0000-0000119ADE82 Message-Id: <577D3854.6090407@de.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2016-07-06_07:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1604210000 definitions=main-1607060146 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/06/2016 10:19 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 09:47:18AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: >> On 06/07/16 08:52, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > >>> Paolo, could you help out with an (x86) KVM interface for this? >> >> Xen support of this interface should be rather easy. Could you please >> Cc: xen-devel-request@lists.xenproject.org in the next version? > > So meta question; aren't all you virt people looking at the regular > virtualization list? Or should we really dig out all the various > hypervisor lists and Cc them? > Some of the kvm on s390 team reads this, but I would assume that the base s390 team does not (Martin can you confirm?) as the main focus was z/VM and LPAR. So maybe adding linux-s390@vger for generic things does make sense.