From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752551AbcGGK0M (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jul 2016 06:26:12 -0400 Received: from smtp.citrix.com ([66.165.176.89]:37476 "EHLO SMTP.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751494AbcGGK0L (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jul 2016 06:26:11 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,324,1464652800"; d="scan'208";a="364805166" Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen-blkback: prefer xenbus_write() over xenbus_printf() where possible To: Jan Beulich , Roger Pau Monne , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk References: <577E299402000078000FBF24@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> CC: , From: David Vrabel Message-ID: <577E2E3A.60803@citrix.com> Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 11:26:02 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <577E299402000078000FBF24@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DLP: MIA2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/07/16 09:06, Jan Beulich wrote: > ... as being the simpler variant. [...] > --- 4.7-rc6-prefer-xenbus_write.orig/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c > +++ 4.7-rc6-prefer-xenbus_write/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c > @@ -617,9 +617,9 @@ static int xen_blkbk_probe(struct xenbus > goto fail; > } > > - err = xenbus_printf(XBT_NIL, dev->nodename, > - "feature-max-indirect-segments", "%u", > - MAX_INDIRECT_SEGMENTS); > + err = xenbus_write(XBT_NIL, dev->nodename, > + "feature-max-indirect-segments", > + __stringify(MAX_INDIRECT_SEGMENTS)); Yuk :( Now someone has to check both __stringify() and MAX_INDIRECT_SEGMENTS to work out what this actually looks like. David