From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Mitchel Humpherys <mitchelh@codeaurora.org>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@codeaurora.org>,
Jeremy Gebben <jgebben@codeaurora.org>,
Patrick Daly <pdaly@codeaurora.org>,
Pratik Patel <pratikp@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: add support for the IOMMU_PRIV flag
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:14:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5783A9AF.3060700@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160709020919.6760-3-mitchelh@codeaurora.org>
On 09/07/16 03:09, Mitchel Humpherys wrote:
> From: Jeremy Gebben <jgebben@codeaurora.org>
>
> Allow the creation of privileged mode mappings, for stage 1 only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Gebben <jgebben@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
> index a1ed1b73fed4..e9e7dd179708 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
> @@ -101,8 +101,10 @@
> ARM_LPAE_PTE_ATTR_HI_MASK)
>
> /* Stage-1 PTE */
> -#define ARM_LPAE_PTE_AP_UNPRIV (((arm_lpae_iopte)1) << 6)
> -#define ARM_LPAE_PTE_AP_RDONLY (((arm_lpae_iopte)2) << 6)
> +#define ARM_LPAE_PTE_AP_PRIV_RW (((arm_lpae_iopte)0) << 6)
> +#define ARM_LPAE_PTE_AP_RW (((arm_lpae_iopte)1) << 6)
> +#define ARM_LPAE_PTE_AP_PRIV_RO (((arm_lpae_iopte)2) << 6)
> +#define ARM_LPAE_PTE_AP_RO (((arm_lpae_iopte)3) << 6)
I'd much rather keep the existing per-bit definitions and compose them
in the code below (which by the look of it should then become a simple
one-liner of making the OR-ing in of AP_UNPRIV conditional.)
Robin.
> #define ARM_LPAE_PTE_ATTRINDX_SHIFT 2
> #define ARM_LPAE_PTE_nG (((arm_lpae_iopte)1) << 11)
>
> @@ -350,10 +352,14 @@ static arm_lpae_iopte arm_lpae_prot_to_pte(struct arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data,
>
> if (data->iop.fmt == ARM_64_LPAE_S1 ||
> data->iop.fmt == ARM_32_LPAE_S1) {
> - pte = ARM_LPAE_PTE_AP_UNPRIV | ARM_LPAE_PTE_nG;
> + pte = ARM_LPAE_PTE_nG;
>
> - if (!(prot & IOMMU_WRITE) && (prot & IOMMU_READ))
> - pte |= ARM_LPAE_PTE_AP_RDONLY;
> + if (prot & IOMMU_WRITE)
> + pte |= (prot & IOMMU_PRIV) ? ARM_LPAE_PTE_AP_PRIV_RW
> + : ARM_LPAE_PTE_AP_RW;
> + else
> + pte |= (prot & IOMMU_PRIV) ? ARM_LPAE_PTE_AP_PRIV_RO
> + : ARM_LPAE_PTE_AP_RO;
>
> if (prot & IOMMU_MMIO)
> pte |= (ARM_LPAE_MAIR_ATTR_IDX_DEV
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-11 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-09 2:09 [PATCH v2 0/6] Add support for privileged mappings Mitchel Humpherys
2016-07-09 2:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] iommu: add IOMMU_PRIV attribute Mitchel Humpherys
2016-07-11 14:08 ` Robin Murphy
2016-07-09 2:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: add support for the IOMMU_PRIV flag Mitchel Humpherys
2016-07-11 14:14 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2016-07-09 2:09 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] Revert "iommu/arm-smmu: Treat all device transactions as unprivileged" Mitchel Humpherys
2016-07-11 14:20 ` Robin Murphy
2016-07-09 2:09 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] common: DMA-mapping: add DMA_ATTR_PRIVILEGED_EXECUTABLE attribute Mitchel Humpherys
2016-07-11 14:46 ` Robin Murphy
2016-07-09 2:09 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] arm64/dma-mapping: Implement DMA_ATTR_PRIVILEGED_EXECUTABLE Mitchel Humpherys
2016-07-11 15:06 ` Robin Murphy
2016-07-09 2:09 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] dmaengine: pl330: Make sure microcode is privileged-executable Mitchel Humpherys
2016-07-11 15:23 ` Robin Murphy
2016-07-11 14:02 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Add support for privileged mappings Robin Murphy
2016-07-11 15:00 ` Jordan Crouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5783A9AF.3060700@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jcrouse@codeaurora.org \
--cc=jgebben@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mitchelh@codeaurora.org \
--cc=pdaly@codeaurora.org \
--cc=pratikp@codeaurora.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).