From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759313AbcGKPUm (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jul 2016 11:20:42 -0400 Received: from smtp.nue.novell.com ([195.135.221.5]:44478 "EHLO smtp.nue.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752568AbcGKPUi (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jul 2016 11:20:38 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/30] ACPICA: 20160318 Release To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" References: <5783AF59.8010609@suse.com> <12994353.mX8QG1g2Nk@vostro.rjw.lan> <2028972.srOPqn9oUn@vostro.rjw.lan> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Lv Zheng , Aleksey Makarov , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Lv Zheng , Linux Kernel Mailing List , ACPI Devel Maling List From: Matthias Brugger Message-ID: <5783B935.9060903@suse.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 17:20:21 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2028972.srOPqn9oUn@vostro.rjw.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/07/16 16:54, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, July 11, 2016 04:48:26 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Monday, July 11, 2016 04:38:17 PM Matthias Brugger wrote: >>> Hi Rafael, >>> >>> On 24/03/16 14:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:38 AM, Lv Zheng wrote: >>>>> The 20160318 ACPICA kernel-resident subsystem updates are linuxized based >>>>> on the linux-pm/linux-next branch. >>>>> >>>>> The patchset has passed the following build/boot tests. >>>>> Build tests are performed as follows: >>>>> 1. i386 + allyes >>>>> 2. i386 + allno >>>>> 3. i386 + default + ACPI_DEBUGGER=y >>>>> 4. i386 + default + ACPI_DEBUGGER=n + ACPI_DEBUG=y >>>>> 5. i386 + default + ACPI_DEBUG=n + ACPI=y >>>>> 6. i386 + default + ACPI=n >>>>> 7. x86_64 + allyes >>>>> 8. x86_64 + allno >>>>> 9. x86_64 + default + ACPI_DEBUGGER=y >>>>> 10.x86_64 + default + ACPI_DEBUGGER=n + ACPI_DEBUG=y >>>>> 11.x86_64 + default + ACPI_DEBUG=n + ACPI=y >>>>> 12.x86_64 + default + ACPI=n >>>>> Boot tests are performed as follows: >>>>> 1. i386 + default + ACPI_DEBUGGER=y >>>>> 2. x86_64 + default + ACPI_DEBUGGER=y >>>>> Where: >>>>> 1. i386: machine named as "Dell Inspiron Mini 1010" >>>>> 2. x86_64: machine named as "HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC" >>>>> 3. default: kernel configuration with following items enabled: >>>>> All hardware drivers related to the machines of i386/x86_64 >>>>> All "drivers/acpi" configurations >>>>> All "drivers/platform" drivers >>>>> All other drivers that link the APIs provided by ACPICA subsystem >>>>> >>>>> The divergences checking result: >>>>> Before applying (20160212 Release): >>>>> 506 lines >>>>> After applying (20160318 Release): >>>>> 494 lines >>>>> >>>>> Al Stone (1): >>>>> ACPICA: IORT: Add in support for the SMMUv3 subtable >>>>> >>>>> Aleksey Makarov (1): >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Bob Moore (16): >>>>> ACPICA: Headers: Minor update for SPCR ACPI table >>>>> ACPICA: ACPI 6.1: Updates for the HEST ACPI table >>>>> ACPICA: ACPI 6.1: Update NFIT table for additional new fields >>>>> ACPICA: Headers: Update DMAR table for October 2014 I/O spec >>>>> ACPICA: Tables: Update FADT handling >>>>> ACPICA: ACPI 6.1: Add full support for this version of ACPI spec >>>>> ACPICA: iASL/Headers: Fix incorrect definition of FPDT table >>>>> ACPICA: Intepreter: Add object extensions to Concatenate operand >>>>> ACPICA: Interpreter: Update some function headers, no functional >>>>> change >>>>> ACPICA: iASL: Cleanup/optimization for ToPLD macro support >>>>> ACPICA: Cleanup some invocation indentations, no functional change >>>>> ACPICA: Headers: Update generation of the ACPICA library >>>>> ACPICA: Utilities: Update for strtoul64 merger >>>>> ACPICA: All: const keyword changes across the ACPICA source >>>>> ACPICA: iASL/Disassembler: Improve handling of unresolved methods >>>>> ACPICA: Update version to 20160318 >>>>> >>>>> Lv Zheng (11): >>>>> ACPICA: Linuxize: reduce divergences for 20160212 release >>>>> ACPICA: Linuxize: Remove useless platform headers >>>>> ACPICA: Utilities: Add ACPI_IS_POWER_OF_TWO() >>>>> Utilities: Fix missing parentheses in ACPI_GET_BITS()/ACPI_SET_BITS() >>>>> ACPICA: Hardware: Enhance acpi_hw_validate_register() with >>>>> access_width/bit_offset awareness >>>>> ACPICA: Hardware: Add access_width/bit_offset support in >>>>> acpi_hw_read() >>>>> ACPICA: Hardware: Add access_width/bit_offset support for >>>>> acpi_hw_write() >>>>> ACPICA: Interpreter: Fix wrong conditions for >>>>> acpi_ev_install_region_handlers() invocation >>>>> ACPICA: Tables: Fix wrong MLC condition for dynamic table loading >>>>> ACPICA: Events: Fix an issue that _REG association can happen before >>>>> namespace is initialized >>>>> ACPICA: Namespace: Reorder \_SB._INI to make sure it is evaluated >>>>> before _REG evaluations >>>>> >>>>> Will Miles (1): >>>>> ACPICA: Add support for QNX 6.6 platform >>>> >>>> This is too late to go in during the current merge window, but I'll >>>> queue it up and send a separate pull request for 4.6 with it next >>>> week. >>>> >>>> I'll fix up the whitespace breakage in the first patch (it is easy >>>> enough to fix up manually), but as Len said, please fix the process to >>>> avoid such things in the future. >>>> >>> >>> I wasn't able to spot this series in linux-next, epsecially patch 03/30: >>> "ACPICA: Headers: Add new constants for the DBG2 ACPI table" >>> >>> Can you please clarify what happened? >> >> It was in linux-next. I'm not sure why you didn't spot it in there. > > It wasn't in there before the merge window opened, though, which really > seems to be what your question is about, right? > > In this particular case an ACPICA release happened right before the > opening of a merge window and the choice was to either push it regardless > or to defer it to the next merge window. > > The latter is not really attractive, though, because it only causes the > delta between upstream ACPICA and the Linux kernel to grow and we get more > stuff in in one go. > > Please note, though, that it had spent some time in linux-next during the > merge window before it was pushed. > Don't worry Rafael, I screwed up my branches, that's why I didn't found the patch I was looking for. Thanks for your explication. Matthias