From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, davem@davemloft.net,
alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, peterz@infradead.org,
tgraf@suug.ch, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] bpf: avoid stack copy and use skb ctx for event output
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 01:45:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5785812B.4080505@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201607130750.HlB4VMOA%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
On 07/13/2016 01:25 AM, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [auto build test WARNING on net-next/master]
>
> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Daniel-Borkmann/BPF-event-output-helper-improvements/20160713-065944
> config: s390-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
> compiler: s390x-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 5.3.1-8) 5.3.1 20160205
> reproduce:
> wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> make.cross ARCH=s390
>
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function 'bpf_perf_event_output':
> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:284:1: warning: 'bpf_perf_event_output' uses dynamic stack allocation
> }
> ^
> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function 'bpf_event_output':
>>> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:319:1: warning: 'bpf_event_output' uses dynamic stack allocation
> }
> ^
Hmm, searching a bit on lkml, it seems these warnings on s390 are actually mostly
harmless I believe [1][2] ... looks like they are there to find structs sitting
on stack, for example, at least that's also what the currently existing one in the
above line (bpf_trace.c +284) appears to be about.
Thanks,
Daniel
[1] http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1601.2/04074.html
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/25/42
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-12 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-12 22:36 [PATCH net-next 0/3] BPF event output helper improvements Daniel Borkmann
2016-07-12 22:36 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] perf, events: add non-linear data support for raw records Daniel Borkmann
2016-07-13 7:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-13 9:24 ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-07-13 12:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-13 13:16 ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-07-13 13:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-13 14:08 ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-07-13 16:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-13 16:53 ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-07-12 22:36 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] bpf, perf: split bpf_perf_event_output Daniel Borkmann
2016-07-12 22:36 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] bpf: avoid stack copy and use skb ctx for event output Daniel Borkmann
2016-07-12 23:25 ` kbuild test robot
2016-07-12 23:45 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2016-07-13 0:01 ` Fengguang Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5785812B.4080505@iogearbox.net \
--to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox