From: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] irqdomain: Export __irq_domain_alloc_irqs() and irq_domain_free_irqs()
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 04:33:59 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57898F07.7030609@linux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <577F6578.6030904@linux.com>
On 08.07.2016 11:34, Alexander Popov wrote:
> On 06.07.2016 14:17, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Fri, 1 Jul 2016, Alexander Popov wrote:
>>
>>> Export __irq_domain_alloc_irqs() and irq_domain_free_irqs() for being
>>> able to work with irq_domain hierarchy in modules.
>>
>> We usually export only when we have a proper use case which is supposed to go
>> into the kernel tree proper. What's yours?
>
> Hello, Thomas,
>
> I work at Positive Technologies ( https://www.ptsecurity.com/ ). We develop
> a bare-metal hypervisor, which targets x86_64 and supports Linux as a guest OS.
>
> Intel VT-x allows hypervisor to inject interrupts into virtual machines.
> We want to handle these interrupts in guest Linux.
>
> So I wrote a simple kernel module creating an irq_domain, which has
> x86_vector_domain as a parent in the hierarchy. In this module I just call:
> - irq_domain_alloc_irqs() to allocate irqs and allow calling request_irq()
> for them;
> - irqd_cfg(irq_get_irq_data()) to get the APIC vectors of the allocated irqs;
> - irq_domain_free_irqs() to free the resources at the end.
>
> It allows to handle interrupts injected by the hypervisor in guest Linux easily,
> without emulating MSI-capable PCI device at the hypervisor side.
>
> Everything works fine if __irq_domain_alloc_irqs() and irq_domain_free_irqs()
> are exported. Is it a proper use-case?
Hello again, Thomas,
Did I properly answer your question? Will you accept my patch exporting these
two functions?
> Do you think my module could be useful for the mainline in some form?
> It took me some time to understand irq_domain hierarchy design, so I can
> prepare some patch or share my code to help others.
Do you think my paravirtualization code registering a child irq_domain
for x86_vector_domain could bring any profit to the mainline?
I would be glad to put effort and do it.
Thanks again, sorry for disturbing.
Best regards,
Alexander
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-16 1:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-01 19:29 [PATCH 1/1] irqdomain: Export __irq_domain_alloc_irqs() and irq_domain_free_irqs() Alexander Popov
2016-07-06 11:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-07-08 8:34 ` Alexander Popov
2016-07-16 1:33 ` Alexander Popov [this message]
2016-07-16 8:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-07-18 12:34 ` Alexander Popov
2016-07-25 19:35 ` Alexander Popov
2016-07-27 11:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-29 23:21 ` Alexander Popov
2016-08-01 11:28 ` Jason Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57898F07.7030609@linux.com \
--to=alex.popov@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).