From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] mmc: sdhci: Request regulators before reading capabilities
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 16:04:31 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <578F76DF.1000500@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <578F764B.2070403@intel.com>
On 20/07/16 16:02, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 12/07/16 16:53, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> The capabilities of the SDHCI host controller are read early during the
>> SDHCI host initialisation in sdhci_setup_host() and before any
>> regulators for the host have been requested. This means that if the host
>> supports some high-speed modes (according to its capabilities register),
>> but the board cannot because the appropriate voltage regulator is not
>> available, then the host cannot easily override the capabilities that
>> are supported.
>>
>> To allow a SDHCI host controller to determine if it can support high
>> speed modes via the presense of the MMC regulators, request the
>
> Try not to confuse High Speed mode with UHS modes.
>
> presense -> presence
>
>> regulators before reading the capabilites of the host controller. This
>
> capabilites -> capabilities
>
>> will allow the SDHCI host to use the 'reset' callback to take the
>> appropriate action (set flags, configure registers, etc) before the
>> capabilities register(s) are read.
>>
>> Please note that some SDHCI hosts, such as the Tegra SDHCI host, has
>> the ability to mask bits in the capabilities register to prevent
>> certain capabilities from being advertised.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Although this is described as a "V2" this patch has been added since
>> the original patch was posted.
>>
>> If the below is deemed not appropriate, then another solution I was
>> thinking of is to allow the SDHCI host to call 'mmc_regulator_get_supply'
>> before calling sdhci_setup_host() and then in sdhci_setup_host() check
>> if any regulators are already present before calling
>> mmc_regulator_get_supply().
>
> And we can still do that later if we need to.
>
>>
>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
>> index 2ee8bfa77116..628c4b3558c0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
>> @@ -3021,6 +3021,17 @@ int sdhci_setup_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
>>
>> mmc = host->mmc;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * If there are external regulators, get them. Note
>> + * this must be done early before resetting the host
>> + * and reading the capabilities so that the host can
>> + * take the appropriate action if regulators are not
>> + * available.
Also you could spread this comment out to 80 columns.
>> + */
>> + ret = mmc_regulator_get_supply(mmc);
>> + if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> sdhci_read_caps(host);
>>
>> override_timeout_clk = host->timeout_clk;
>> @@ -3253,11 +3264,6 @@ int sdhci_setup_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
>> mmc_gpio_get_cd(host->mmc) < 0)
>> mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL;
>>
>> - /* If there are external regulators, get them */
>> - ret = mmc_regulator_get_supply(mmc);
>> - if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> - goto undma;
>
> All goto's before this now need to goto unreg.
>
>> -
>> /* If vqmmc regulator and no 1.8V signalling, then there's no UHS */
>> if (!IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vqmmc)) {
>> ret = regulator_enable(mmc->supply.vqmmc);
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-20 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-12 13:53 [PATCH V2 1/2] mmc: sdhci: Request regulators before reading capabilities Jon Hunter
2016-07-12 13:53 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] mmc: tegra: Only advertise UHS modes if IO regulator is present Jon Hunter
2016-07-12 13:56 ` Jon Hunter
2016-07-21 6:47 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-07-23 9:38 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-07-20 13:02 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] mmc: sdhci: Request regulators before reading capabilities Adrian Hunter
2016-07-20 13:04 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2016-07-21 6:39 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-07-23 9:37 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=578F76DF.1000500@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).