public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Rusty Russel <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/core: make "Preemption disabled at" message more useful
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 14:25:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5798A84E.70806@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160727103814.GB8845@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 573 bytes --]

On 07/27/2016 12:38 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm assuming you want to declare and initialise preempt_disable_ip at
>> once here, but it generates slightly worse code since it dereferences
>> current->preempt_disable_ip in the "fast path" (i.e. a sleeping
>> function is NOT called from an invalid context).
>
> Could you please add a likely() branch to see whether GCC will delay the
> initialization?
>
> The 4 #ifdefs were really ugly, so yes, it would be nice to at least reduce them
> to 2.

How about this?


Vegard

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-sched-core-make-Preemption-disabled-at-message-more-.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 4505 bytes --]

>From 9d0e4bb63f0fada627a4f99432db8d39add487b4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 09:46:39 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] sched/core: make "Preemption disabled at" message more useful

This message is currently really useless since it always prints a value
that comes from the printk() we just did, e.g.:

    BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.h:388
    in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 31996, name: trinity-c1
    Preemption disabled at:[<ffffffff8119db33>] down_trylock+0x13/0x80

    BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/linux/freezer.h:56
    in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 31996, name: trinity-c1
    Preemption disabled at:[<ffffffff811aaa37>] console_unlock+0x2f7/0x930

Here, both down_trylock() and console_unlock() is somewhere in the
printk() path.

We should save the value before calling printk() and use the saved value
instead. That immediately reveals the offending callsite:

    BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.h:388
    in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 14971, name: trinity-c2
    Preemption disabled at:[<ffffffff819bcd46>] rhashtable_walk_start+0x46/0x150

(Bug report: http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=146925979821849&w=2)

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Rusty Russel <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
---
 include/linux/sched.h |  9 +++++++++
 kernel/sched/core.c   | 21 +++++++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 253538f2..cdbcc2e 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -3142,6 +3142,15 @@ static inline void cond_resched_rcu(void)
 #endif
 }
 
+static inline unsigned long get_preempt_disable_ip(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
+	return p->preempt_disable_ip;
+#else
+	return 0;
+#endif
+}
+
 /*
  * Does a critical section need to be broken due to another
  * task waiting?: (technically does not depend on CONFIG_PREEMPT,
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 7171cf9..afd2403 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3144,6 +3144,9 @@ static inline void preempt_latency_stop(int val) { }
  */
 static noinline void __schedule_bug(struct task_struct *prev)
 {
+	/* Save this before calling printk(), since that will clobber it */
+	unsigned long preempt_disable_ip = get_preempt_disable_ip(current);
+
 	if (oops_in_progress)
 		return;
 
@@ -3154,13 +3157,12 @@ static noinline void __schedule_bug(struct task_struct *prev)
 	print_modules();
 	if (irqs_disabled())
 		print_irqtrace_events(prev);
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
-	if (in_atomic_preempt_off()) {
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT)
+	    && in_atomic_preempt_off()) {
 		pr_err("Preemption disabled at:");
-		print_ip_sym(current->preempt_disable_ip);
+		print_ip_sym(preempt_disable_ip);
 		pr_cont("\n");
 	}
-#endif
 	dump_stack();
 	add_taint(TAINT_WARN, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
 }
@@ -7541,6 +7543,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__might_sleep);
 void ___might_sleep(const char *file, int line, int preempt_offset)
 {
 	static unsigned long prev_jiffy;	/* ratelimiting */
+	unsigned long preempt_disable_ip;
 
 	rcu_sleep_check(); /* WARN_ON_ONCE() by default, no rate limit reqd. */
 	if ((preempt_count_equals(preempt_offset) && !irqs_disabled() &&
@@ -7551,6 +7554,9 @@ void ___might_sleep(const char *file, int line, int preempt_offset)
 		return;
 	prev_jiffy = jiffies;
 
+	/* Save this before calling printk(), since that will clobber it */
+	preempt_disable_ip = get_preempt_disable_ip(current);
+
 	printk(KERN_ERR
 		"BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at %s:%d\n",
 			file, line);
@@ -7565,13 +7571,12 @@ void ___might_sleep(const char *file, int line, int preempt_offset)
 	debug_show_held_locks(current);
 	if (irqs_disabled())
 		print_irqtrace_events(current);
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
-	if (!preempt_count_equals(preempt_offset)) {
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT)
+	    && !preempt_count_equals(preempt_offset)) {
 		pr_err("Preemption disabled at:");
-		print_ip_sym(current->preempt_disable_ip);
+		print_ip_sym(preempt_disable_ip);
 		pr_cont("\n");
 	}
-#endif
 	dump_stack();
 	add_taint(TAINT_WARN, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
 }
-- 
1.9.1


      reply	other threads:[~2016-07-27 12:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-23  7:58 [PATCH] sched/core: make "Preemption disabled at" message more useful Vegard Nossum
2016-07-27  9:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-07-27  9:36   ` Vegard Nossum
2016-07-27 10:38     ` Ingo Molnar
2016-07-27 12:25       ` Vegard Nossum [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5798A84E.70806@oracle.com \
    --to=vegard.nossum@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox