From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: "Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
Cc: "Daniel Lezcano" <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>,
"open list:CLOCKSOURCE,
CLOCKEVENT DRIVERS" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: Support reading clock rate from a driver
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 11:31:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <579B3090.1070709@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160729101811.GB21580@leverpostej>
On 29/07/16 11:18, Mark Rutland wrote:
> [adding Marc to Cc]
>
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 11:23:11AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
>>
>> On some devices using arch code for reading clock rate doesn't work. So
>> far the only option was to specify clock-frequency in a DT. This works
>> only if a clock frequency doesn't have to be calculated on runtime.
>>
>> On BCM53573 SoC (with Cortex-A7) there is ILP clock that needs its own
>> driver. With this change we can query such clocks by using a standard:
>> clocks = <&foo>;
>
> The clock for the architected timer(s) are supposed to be configured
> before entering Linux. The clock-frequency property is at best a dodgy
> workaround, and this is even worse.
>
> Please fix your firmware to configure and enabled this clock before
> entering Linux, and to program CNTFRQ appropriately.
I'll add that failure to do so breaks other subsystems which do rely on
CNTFRQ to be correctly programmed *on each CPU* (like KVM and Xen).
Please follow the requirements of the architecture and don't just paper
over such a bug.
> As this path stands, NAK.
Seconded.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-29 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-29 9:23 [PATCH] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: Support reading clock rate from a driver Rafał Miłecki
2016-07-29 10:18 ` Mark Rutland
2016-07-29 10:31 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=579B3090.1070709@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox