From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, wangnan0@huawei.com,
hemant@linux.vnet.ibm.com, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf uprobe: Skip prologue if program compiled without optimization
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 14:32:00 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57A1B308.7070606@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160802235230.31bb9a50d88e4838926f5609@kernel.org>
Thanks Masami,
On Tuesday 02 August 2016 08:22 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 14:19:28 +0530
> Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> Function prologue prepares stack and registers before executing function
>> logic. When target program is compiled without optimization, function
>> parameter information is only valid after prologue. When we probe entrypc
>> of the function, and try to record function parameter, it contains
>> garbage value.
>>
[SNIP]
>> +
>> + /* Only FUNC and FUNC@SRC are eligible. */
>> + if (!pp->function || pp->line || pp->retprobe || pp->lazy_line ||
>> + pp->offset || pp->abs_address)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + /* Not interested in func parameter? */
>> + if (!pf->pev->nargs)
>> + return;
> Hmm, this is not enough, since perf-probe accepts registers and stacks.
> At least you should check if all argument are !is_c_varname(), !PROBE_ARG_VARS and
> !PROBE_ARG_PARAMS here, instead of checking nargs.
>
>> +
>> + pr_info("Target program is compiled without optimization. Skipping prologue.\n"
>> + "Use %s:1 or absolute address 0x%lx to force probe on entry point.\n\n",
> Hmm, is <Function>:1 always available? I think we should just recommend to use only
> the address.
> (moreover, pf->addr may not the absolute address in uprobe event, we'd better say
> "the address 0x%x")
Nice catch. :)
Sent v2. Please review it.
-Ravi
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-03 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-01 8:49 [PATCH] perf uprobe: Skip prologue if program compiled without optimization Ravi Bangoria
2016-08-02 14:52 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-08-03 9:02 ` Ravi Bangoria [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57A1B308.7070606@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hemant@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox