From: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Robert Richter <robert.richter@cavium.com>
Cc: <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
<catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <will.deacon@arm.com>,
<mark.rutland@arm.com>, Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com>,
<kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
<zlim.lnx@gmail.com>, <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
<david.daney@cavium.com>, <agraf@suse.de>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
<lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>, <james.morse@arm.com>,
<dave.long@linaro.org>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
<kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>, <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Add workaround for Cavium erratum 26026
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 09:37:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57A4C0D3.2060408@caviumnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160805070030.GQ22012@rric.localdomain>
On 08/05/2016 12:00 AM, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 04.08.16 14:40:48, David Daney wrote:
>> On 08/04/2016 01:57 PM, Robert Richter wrote:
>>> The patch below is on top of Matthias' patch series:
>>>
>>> arm64: Implement IPI based TLB invalidation
>>>
>>> The series is used to enable a workaround for Cavium ThunderX pass 1.x
>>> systems.
>>
>>
>> Where are the rest of the patches in the series? I would have expected
>> something like "[PATCH 1/X] arm64:..." with X being greater than one.
>
> You are cc'ed here too:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/4/101
>
OK, I got confused by the fact that this patch was retroactively added
to the patch set and was missing the sequence numbering.
> -Robert
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-05 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-04 9:15 arm64: Implement IPI based TLB invalidation Matthias Brugger
2016-08-04 9:15 ` [PATCH 1/4] arm64: insn: Do not disable irqs during patching Matthias Brugger
2016-08-04 9:15 ` [PATCH 2/4] arm64: Implement IPI based TLB invalidation Matthias Brugger
2016-08-04 9:15 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: arm/arm64: Check for broadcast TLBI support Matthias Brugger
2016-08-06 7:22 ` kbuild test robot
2016-08-04 9:15 ` [PATCH 4/4] arm64: hibernate: " Matthias Brugger
2016-08-04 20:57 ` [PATCH] arm64: Add workaround for Cavium erratum 26026 Robert Richter
2016-08-04 21:40 ` David Daney
2016-08-05 7:00 ` Robert Richter
2016-08-05 16:37 ` David Daney [this message]
2016-08-05 2:35 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57A4C0D3.2060408@caviumnetworks.com \
--to=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=dave.long@linaro.org \
--cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mbrugger@suse.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=robert.richter@cavium.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=zlim.lnx@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox