From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753113AbcHQTC2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Aug 2016 15:02:28 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:52977 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752626AbcHQTCY (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Aug 2016 15:02:24 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] acpi, clocksource: add GTDT driver and GTDT support in arm_arch_timer To: Lorenzo Pieralisi , Fu Wei Cc: Hanjun Guo , Tomasz Nowicki , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Daniel Lezcano , Thomas Gleixner , Marc Zyngier , Sudeep Holla , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Linaro ACPI Mailman List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , ACPI Devel Maling List , rruigrok@codeaurora.org, harba@codeaurora.org, Christopher Covington , G Gregory , Al Stone , Jon Masters , wei@redhat.com, Arnd Bergmann , Wim Van Sebroeck , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Suravee Suthikulpanit , Leo Duran , Guenter Roeck , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org References: <1469535565-20924-1-git-send-email-fu.wei@linaro.org> <0befd611-91a7-88e9-1686-82929c1745e8@semihalf.com> <510fa357-a729-4ce1-7c10-4cef06feb7b7@linaro.org> <20160811105848.GA25680@red-moon> From: Timur Tabi Message-ID: <57B4B47E.5030100@codeaurora.org> Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 14:01:18 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/43.0 SeaMonkey/2.40 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160811105848.GA25680@red-moon> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > I do not think you need a v11 just to remove the drivers/acpi/arm64 > directory creation, you need to get Daniel/Thomas review/ack on > the respective patches though, I do not see the point of churning > out another series just because drivers/acpi/arm64 is now created > in the IORT patch series. If v10 is ok you will rebase it on top of > Tomasz's series and mention the dependency in the respective pull > request. > > If there is need for a v11 following Daniel/Thomas review yes, > you can proceed as above. What's the latest on this patchset? I really want them in 4.9. Is everything queued up, or are still issues that need to be resolved. Who will be merging these patches? -- Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.