public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>
To: Vaishali Thakkar <vaishali.thakkar@oracle.com>,
	Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Subject: Re: Use of copy_to_user in fireworks_hwdep.c while holding a spin_lock
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 22:24:49 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57B708A1.9010607@sakamocchi.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57B6A61F.7080700@oracle.com>

Hi,

On Aug 19 2016 15:24, Vaishali Thakkar wrote:
> I was wondering about the call to copy_to_user in function hwdep_read_locked and
> hwdep_read_resp_buf for driver sound/firewire/fireworks/fireworks_hwdep.c. 
> The function hwdep_read calls both of these functions while holding a spinlock[1],
> which is not normally allowed due to the possibility of a deadlock.
> 
> This seems to be coming from the commit 555e8a8f7f149544eb7d4aa3a6420bc4c3055638
> while adding a command/response functionality into hwdep interface. Is there some
> reason that I am overlooking, why it is OK in this case? Is there some code in the
> same file which ensures that page fault will not occur when we are calling these
> functions while holding a spin_lock_irq?
> 
> The same issue is there with the driver sound/firewire/tascam/tascam-hwdep.c for
> obvious reasons.
> 
> Coccinelle script is used to detect this issue.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> [1] http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/sound/firewire/fireworks/fireworks_hwdep.c#L114

Indeed, I was unaware of the situation in which deadlock occurs; i.e.
page fault.

I'm on short summer vacation, so will post patches for them in next week.


Thanks

Takashi Sakamoto

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-19 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-19  6:24 Use of copy_to_user in fireworks_hwdep.c while holding a spin_lock Vaishali Thakkar
2016-08-19 13:24 ` Takashi Sakamoto [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-08-19  6:06 Vaishali Thakkar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57B708A1.9010607@sakamocchi.jp \
    --to=o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=clemens@ladisch.de \
    --cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=perex@perex.cz \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.com \
    --cc=vaishali.thakkar@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox