From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Frank Rowand" <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>, Xinwei Hu <huxinwei@huawei.com>,
"Tianhong Ding" <dingtianhong@huawei.com>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/14] fix some type infos and bugs for arm64/of numa
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 15:47:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57BAAE1B.2070808@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1470908028-8596-1-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Hi everybody:
Is this patch series can be accepted or still need to be improved? It seems
to have been a long time.
Thanks,
Zhen Lei
On 2016/8/11 17:33, Zhen Lei wrote:
> v5 -> v6:
> Move memblk nid check from arch/arm64/mm/numa.c into drivers/of/of_numa.c,
> because this check is arch independent.
>
> This modification only related to patch 3, but impacted the contents of patch 7 and 8,
> other patches have no change.
>
> v4 -> v5:
> This version has no code changes, just add "Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>"
> into patches 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 13, 14. Because these patches rely on some acpi numa
> patches, and the latter had not been upstreamed in 4.7, but upstreamed in 4.8-rc1,
> so I resend my patches again.
>
> v3 -> v4:
> 1. Packed three patches of Kefeng Wang, patch6-8.
> 2. Add 6 new patches(9-15) to enhance the numa on arm64.
>
> v2 -> v3:
> 1. Adjust patch2 and patch5 according to Matthias Brugger's advice, to make the
> patches looks more well. The final code have no change.
>
> v1 -> v2:
> 1. Base on https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/24/679
> 2. Rewrote of_numa_parse_memory_nodes according to Rob Herring's advice. So that it looks more clear.
> 3. Rewrote patch 5 because some scenes were not considered before.
>
> Kefeng Wang (3):
> of_numa: Use of_get_next_parent to simplify code
> of_numa: Use pr_fmt()
> arm64: numa: Use pr_fmt()
>
> Zhen Lei (11):
> of/numa: remove a duplicated pr_debug information
> of/numa: fix a memory@ node can only contains one memory block
> arm64/numa: add nid check for memory block
> of/numa: remove a duplicated warning
> arm64/numa: avoid inconsistent information to be printed
> arm64/numa: support HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA
> arm64/numa: define numa_distance as array to simplify code
> arm64/numa: support HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES
> arm64/numa: remove some useless code
> of/numa: remove the constraint on the distances of node pairs
> Documentation: remove the constraint on the distances of node pairs
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/numa.txt | 1 -
> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 12 ++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h | 1 -
> arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 1 +
> arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 223 ++++++++++++++++-------------
> drivers/of/of_numa.c | 88 ++++++------
> 6 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 148 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.5.0
>
>
>
> .
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-22 7:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-11 9:33 [PATCH v6 00/14] fix some type infos and bugs for arm64/of numa Zhen Lei
2016-08-11 9:33 ` [PATCH v6 01/14] of/numa: remove a duplicated pr_debug information Zhen Lei
2016-08-11 9:33 ` [PATCH v6 02/14] of/numa: fix a memory@ node can only contains one memory block Zhen Lei
2016-08-11 9:33 ` [PATCH v6 03/14] arm64/numa: add nid check for " Zhen Lei
2016-08-11 9:33 ` [PATCH v6 04/14] of/numa: remove a duplicated warning Zhen Lei
2016-08-11 9:33 ` [PATCH v6 05/14] arm64/numa: avoid inconsistent information to be printed Zhen Lei
2016-08-11 9:33 ` [PATCH v6 06/14] of_numa: Use of_get_next_parent to simplify code Zhen Lei
2016-08-11 9:33 ` [PATCH v6 07/14] of_numa: Use pr_fmt() Zhen Lei
2016-08-11 9:33 ` [PATCH v6 08/14] arm64: numa: " Zhen Lei
2016-08-11 9:33 ` [PATCH v6 09/14] arm64/numa: support HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA Zhen Lei
2016-08-11 9:33 ` [PATCH v6 10/14] arm64/numa: define numa_distance as array to simplify code Zhen Lei
2016-08-11 9:33 ` [PATCH v6 11/14] arm64/numa: support HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES Zhen Lei
2016-08-11 9:33 ` [PATCH v6 12/14] arm64/numa: remove some useless code Zhen Lei
2016-08-11 9:33 ` [PATCH v6 13/14] of/numa: remove the constraint on the distances of node pairs Zhen Lei
2016-08-11 9:33 ` [PATCH v6 14/14] Documentation: " Zhen Lei
2016-08-22 7:47 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57BAAE1B.2070808@huawei.com \
--to=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dingtianhong@huawei.com \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=huxinwei@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox