From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754693AbcHVHwN (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2016 03:52:13 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([58.251.152.64]:59890 "EHLO szxga01-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753149AbcHVHwL (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2016 03:52:11 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/14] fix some type infos and bugs for arm64/of numa To: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel , linux-kernel , Rob Herring , "Frank Rowand" , devicetree References: <1470908028-8596-1-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> CC: Zefan Li , Xinwei Hu , "Tianhong Ding" , Hanjun Guo From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" Message-ID: <57BAAE1B.2070808@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 15:47:39 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1470908028-8596-1-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.177.23.164] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020201.57BAAEE3.013E,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 3cadc49f72b290ff73ed8cb969d49ebf Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi everybody: Is this patch series can be accepted or still need to be improved? It seems to have been a long time. Thanks, Zhen Lei On 2016/8/11 17:33, Zhen Lei wrote: > v5 -> v6: > Move memblk nid check from arch/arm64/mm/numa.c into drivers/of/of_numa.c, > because this check is arch independent. > > This modification only related to patch 3, but impacted the contents of patch 7 and 8, > other patches have no change. > > v4 -> v5: > This version has no code changes, just add "Acked-by: Rob Herring " > into patches 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 13, 14. Because these patches rely on some acpi numa > patches, and the latter had not been upstreamed in 4.7, but upstreamed in 4.8-rc1, > so I resend my patches again. > > v3 -> v4: > 1. Packed three patches of Kefeng Wang, patch6-8. > 2. Add 6 new patches(9-15) to enhance the numa on arm64. > > v2 -> v3: > 1. Adjust patch2 and patch5 according to Matthias Brugger's advice, to make the > patches looks more well. The final code have no change. > > v1 -> v2: > 1. Base on https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/24/679 > 2. Rewrote of_numa_parse_memory_nodes according to Rob Herring's advice. So that it looks more clear. > 3. Rewrote patch 5 because some scenes were not considered before. > > Kefeng Wang (3): > of_numa: Use of_get_next_parent to simplify code > of_numa: Use pr_fmt() > arm64: numa: Use pr_fmt() > > Zhen Lei (11): > of/numa: remove a duplicated pr_debug information > of/numa: fix a memory@ node can only contains one memory block > arm64/numa: add nid check for memory block > of/numa: remove a duplicated warning > arm64/numa: avoid inconsistent information to be printed > arm64/numa: support HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA > arm64/numa: define numa_distance as array to simplify code > arm64/numa: support HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES > arm64/numa: remove some useless code > of/numa: remove the constraint on the distances of node pairs > Documentation: remove the constraint on the distances of node pairs > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/numa.txt | 1 - > arch/arm64/Kconfig | 12 ++ > arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h | 1 - > arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 1 + > arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 223 ++++++++++++++++------------- > drivers/of/of_numa.c | 88 ++++++------ > 6 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 148 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.5.0 > > > > . >