From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, treeze.taeung@gmail.com,
naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, markus@trippelsdorf.de,
chris.ryder@arm.com, pawel.moll@arm.com, mhiramat@kernel.org,
rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk, jolsa@kernel.org,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, hemant@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
namhyung@kernel.org,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/7] perf annotate: Do not ignore call instruction with indirect target
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 20:05:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57E14917.5070100@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160919154413.GA14725@kernel.org>
Hi Arnaldo,
On Monday 19 September 2016 09:14 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 06:29:35PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria escreveu:
>> Do not ignore call instruction with indirect target when its already
>> identified as a call. This is an extension of commit e8ea1561952b
>> ("perf annotate: Use raw form for register indirect call instructions")
>> to generalize annotation for all instructions with indirect calls.
>>
>> This is needed for certain powerpc call instructions that use address
>> in a register (such as bctrl, btarl, ...).
>>
>> Apart from that, when kcore is used to disassemble function, all call
>> instructions were ignored. This patch will fix it as a side effect by
>> not ignoring them. For example,
>>
>> Before (with kcore):
>> mov %r13,%rdi
>> callq 0xffffffff811a7e70
>> ^ jmpq 64
>> mov %gs:0x7ef41a6e(%rip),%al
>>
>> After (with kcore):
>> mov %r13,%rdi
>> > callq 0xffffffff811a7e70
>> ^ jmpq 64
>> mov %gs:0x7ef41a6e(%rip),%al
> Ok, makes sense, but then now I have the -> and can't press enter to go
> to that function, in fact for the case I'm using as a test, the
> vsnprintf kernel function, I get:
>
> │ 56: test %al,%al ▒
> │ ↓ je 81 ▒
> │ lea -0x38(%rbp),%rsi ▒
> │ mov %r15,%rdi ▒
> │ → callq 0xffffffff993e3230
>
> That 0xffffffff993e3230 should've been resolved to:
>
> [root@jouet ~]# grep ffffffff993e3230 /proc/kallsyms
> ffffffff993e3230 t format_decode
>
> Trying to investigate why it doesn't...
I investigated this.
If this example is with kcore, then it's expected. Because, perf annotate does
not inspect kallsyms when it can't find symbol name from disassembly itself.
For example, disassembly of finish_task_switch,
with kcore:
ffffffff810cf1b0: mov $0x1,%esi
ffffffff810cf1b5: mov $0x4,%edi
ffffffff810cf1ba: callq 0xffffffff811aced0
ffffffff810cf1bf: andb $0xfb,0x4c4(%rbx)
ffffffff810cf1c6: jmpq 0xffffffff810cf0e9
ffffffff810cf1cb: mov %rbx,%rsi
ffffffff810cf1ce: mov %r13,%rdi
ffffffff810cf1d1: callq 0xffffffff811a7e70
ffffffff810cf1d6: jmpq 0xffffffff810cf0e4
with debuginfo:
ffffffff810cf1b0: mov $0x1,%esi
ffffffff810cf1b5: mov $0x4,%edi
ffffffff810cf1ba: callq ffffffff811aced0 <___perf_sw_event>
ffffffff810cf1bf: andb $0xfb,0x4c4(%rbx)
ffffffff810cf1c6: jmpq ffffffff810cf0e9 <finish_task_switch+0x69>
ffffffff810cf1cb: mov %rbx,%rsi
ffffffff810cf1ce: mov %r13,%rdi
ffffffff810cf1d1: callq ffffffff811a7e70 <__perf_event_task_sched_in>
ffffffff810cf1d6: jmpq ffffffff810cf0e4 <finish_task_switch+0x64>
call__parse tries to find symbol from angle brackets which is not present
in case of kcore.
-Ravi
> - Arnaldo
>
>> Suggested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
>> [Suggested about 'bctrl' instruction]
>> Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v6:
>> - No change
>>
>> tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 8 ++------
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
>> index ea07588..a05423b 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
>> @@ -81,16 +81,12 @@ static int call__parse(struct ins_operands *ops, const char *norm_arch)
>> return ops->target.name == NULL ? -1 : 0;
>>
>> indirect_call:
>> - tok = strchr(endptr, '(');
>> - if (tok != NULL) {
>> + tok = strchr(endptr, '*');
>> + if (tok == NULL) {
>> ops->target.addr = 0;
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> - tok = strchr(endptr, '*');
>> - if (tok == NULL)
>> - return -1;
>> -
>> ops->target.addr = strtoull(tok + 1, NULL, 16);
>> return 0;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.5.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-20 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-19 12:59 [PATCH v6 0/7] perf: Cross arch annotate + few miscellaneous fixes Ravi Bangoria
2016-08-19 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] perf: Define macro for normalized arch names Ravi Bangoria
2016-08-19 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] perf annotate: Add cross arch annotate support Ravi Bangoria
2016-08-22 23:01 ` Kim Phillips
2016-08-23 2:17 ` Namhyung Kim
2016-08-23 20:36 ` Kim Phillips
2016-08-26 6:21 ` Namhyung Kim
2016-08-26 7:26 ` Ravi Bangoria
2016-08-27 0:40 ` [PATCH] perf annotate: cross arch annotate support fixes for ARM Kim Phillips
2016-08-19 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] perf annotate: Add support for powerpc Ravi Bangoria
2016-09-19 15:26 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-08-19 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] perf annotate: Do not ignore call instruction with indirect target Ravi Bangoria
2016-09-19 15:44 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-09-20 14:35 ` Ravi Bangoria [this message]
2016-09-20 14:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-09-20 21:43 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Ravi Bangoria
2016-08-19 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] perf annotate: Show raw form for jump " Ravi Bangoria
2016-08-19 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] perf annotate: Support jump instruction with target as second operand Ravi Bangoria
2016-08-19 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] perf annotate: Fix jump target outside of function address range Ravi Bangoria
2016-09-07 15:39 ` [PATCH v6 0/7] perf: Cross arch annotate + few miscellaneous fixes Ravi Bangoria
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57E14917.5070100@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris.ryder@arm.com \
--cc=hemant@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=markus@trippelsdorf.de \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=treeze.taeung@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).