From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf probe: check if *ptr2 is zero and not ptr2
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 12:22:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57F23F71.1060509@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161003111919.GA12073@kernel.org>
On 03/10/16 12:19, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 11:34:31AM +0100, Colin King escreveu:
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>>
>> Static anaylsis with cppcheck detected an incorrect comparison:
>> [tools/perf/util/probe-event.c:216]: (warning) Char literal compared with
>> pointer 'ptr2'. Did you intend to dereference it?
>
> What tool was used for that?
cppcheck https://github.com/danmar/cppcheck - I run it nearly daily on
linux-next and linux
>
> - Arnaldo
>
>> Dereference ptr2 for the comparison to fix this.
>>
>> Fixes: 35726d3a4ca9 ("perf probe: Fix to cut off incompatible chars from group name")
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>> ---
>> tools/perf/util/probe-event.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
>> index fcfbef0..d281ae2 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
>> @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static int convert_exec_to_group(const char *exec, char **result)
>> goto out;
>> }
>>
>> - for (ptr2 = ptr1; ptr2 != '\0'; ptr2++) {
>> + for (ptr2 = ptr1; *ptr2 != '\0'; ptr2++) {
>> if (!isalnum(*ptr2) && *ptr2 != '_') {
>> *ptr2 = '\0';
>> break;
>> --
>> 2.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-03 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-03 10:34 [PATCH] perf probe: check if *ptr2 is zero and not ptr2 Colin King
2016-10-03 11:19 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-10-03 11:22 ` Colin Ian King [this message]
2016-10-03 11:45 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-10-04 2:28 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-10-04 8:09 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf probe: Check " tip-bot for Colin Ian King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57F23F71.1060509@canonical.com \
--to=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox