From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>, iommu@lists.linux.dev
Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] iommu/vt-d: Remove caching mode check before device TLB flush
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 21:48:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57d2fe8c-b438-42ae-a1ff-0ba0ee226c37@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51055d13-4a72-4000-9a22-b403d8c5b2ff@arm.com>
On 2024/4/11 21:13, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 10/04/2024 6:58 am, Lu Baolu wrote:
>> The Caching Mode (CM) of the Intel IOMMU indicates if the hardware
>> implementation caches not-present or erroneous translation-structure
>> entries except the first-stage translation. The caching mode is
>> irrelevant to the device TLB , therefore there is no need to check
>> it before a device TLB invalidation operation.
>>
>> iommu_flush_iotlb_psi() is called in map and unmap paths. The caching
>> mode check before device TLB invalidation will cause device TLB
>> invalidation always issued if IOMMU is not running in caching mode.
>> This is wrong and causes unnecessary performance overhead.
>>
>> The removal of caching mode check in intel_flush_iotlb_all() doesn't
>> impact anything no matter the IOMMU is working in caching mode or not.
>> Commit <29b32839725f> ("iommu/vt-d: Do not use flush-queue when
>> caching-mode is on") has already disabled flush-queue for caching mode,
>> hence caching mode will never call intel_flush_iotlb_all().
>
> Well, technically it might still, at domain creation via
> iommu_create_device_direct_mappings(), but domain->has_iotlb_device
> should definitely be false at that point 🙂
Oh! I overlooked that path. :-)
Yes. iommu_create_device_direct_mappings() is called before setting the
domain to device for intel iommu driver, hence in practice the
domain->has_iotlb_device is always false.
Best regards,
baolu
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-11 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-10 5:58 [PATCH v2 1/1] iommu/vt-d: Remove caching mode check before device TLB flush Lu Baolu
2024-04-10 6:14 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-04-10 6:30 ` Yi Liu
2024-04-10 8:02 ` Baolu Lu
2024-04-10 9:14 ` Yi Liu
2024-04-10 10:38 ` Baolu Lu
2024-04-12 9:34 ` Yi Liu
2024-04-11 13:13 ` Robin Murphy
2024-04-11 13:48 ` Baolu Lu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57d2fe8c-b438-42ae-a1ff-0ba0ee226c37@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox