From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757274AbcKDCWw (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2016 22:22:52 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([58.251.152.64]:13667 "EHLO szxga01-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753772AbcKDCWv (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2016 22:22:51 -0400 Message-ID: <581BF0D0.9010400@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 10:22:08 +0800 From: zhong jiang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: , , , , , , , Paul Gortmaker Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] hugetlbfs: fix the hugetlbfs can not be mounted References: <1477721311-54522-1-git-send-email-zhongjiang@huawei.com> <20161103121721.50040185d201e3aac27fd366@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20161103121721.50040185d201e3aac27fd366@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.177.29.68] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2016/11/4 3:17, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sat, 29 Oct 2016 14:08:31 +0800 zhongjiang wrote: > >> From: zhong jiang >> >> Since 'commit 3e89e1c5ea84 ("hugetlb: make mm and fs code explicitly non-modular")' >> bring in the mainline. mount hugetlbfs will result in the following issue. >> >> mount: unknown filesystme type 'hugetlbfs' >> >> because previous patch remove the module_alias_fs, when we mount the fs type, >> the caller get_fs_type can not find the filesystem. >> >> The patch just recover the module_alias_fs to identify the hugetlbfs. > hm, 3e89e1c5ea84 ("hugetlb: make mm and fs code explicitly > non-modular") was merged almost a year ago. And you are apparently the > first person to discover this regression. Can you think why that is? when I pull the upstream patch in 4.9-rc2. I find that I cannot mount the hugetlbfs. but when I pull the upstream remain patch in the next day. I test again. it work well. so I reply the mail right now, please ignore the patch. The detailed reason is not digged. I am sorry for wasting your time. Thanks you zhongjiang >> index 4fb7b10..b63e7de 100644 >> --- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c >> +++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c >> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ >> #include >> #include >> #include >> +#include >> #include >> >> #include >> @@ -1209,6 +1210,7 @@ static struct dentry *hugetlbfs_mount(struct file_system_type *fs_type, >> .mount = hugetlbfs_mount, >> .kill_sb = kill_litter_super, >> }; >> +MODULE_ALIAS_FS("hugetlbfs"); >> >> static struct vfsmount *hugetlbfs_vfsmount[HUGE_MAX_HSTATE]; >> > > . >