From: Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>
To: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
eric.auger.pro@gmail.com, christoffer.dall@linaro.org,
marc.zyngier@arm.com, robin.murphy@arm.com,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, will.deacon@arm.com, joro@8bytes.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, jason@lakedaemon.net,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, drjones@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pranav.sawargaonkar@gmail.com,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, punit.agrawal@arm.com,
diana.craciun@nxp.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 00/10] KVM PCIe/MSI passthrough on ARM/ARM64 and IOVA reserved regions
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 21:05:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <584CB481.3040902@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c5d4efa7-699d-4aa3-44cc-4ce03d0ce185@redhat.com>
On 12/08/2016 04:36 AM, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 15/11/2016 14:09, Eric Auger wrote:
>> Following LPC discussions, we now report reserved regions through
>> iommu-group sysfs reserved_regions attribute file.
>
>
> While I am respinning this series into v4, here is a tentative summary
> of technical topics for which no consensus was reached at this point.
>
> 1) Shall we report the usable IOVA range instead of reserved IOVA
> ranges. Not discussed at/after LPC.
> x I currently report reserved regions. Alex expressed the need to
> report the full usable IOVA range instead (x86 min-max range
> minus MSI APIC window). I think this is meaningful for ARM
> too where arm-smmu might not support the full 64b range.
> x Any objection we report the usable IOVA regions instead?
>
> 2) Shall the kernel check collision with MSI window* when userspace
> calls VFIO_IOMMU_MAP_DMA?
> Joerg/Will No; Alex yes
> *for IOVA regions consumed downstream to the IOMMU: everyone says NO
>
> 3) RMRR reporting in the iommu group sysfs? Joerg: yes; Don: no
Um, I'm missing context, but the only thing I recall saying no to wrt RMRR
is that _any_ device that has an RMRR cannot be assigned to a guest.
Or, are you saying, RMRR's should be exposed in the guest os? if so, then
you have my 'no' there.
> My current series does not expose them in iommu group sysfs.
> I understand we can expose the RMRR regions in the iomm group sysfs
> without necessarily supporting RMRR requiring device assignment.
This sentence doesn't make sense to me.
Can you try re-wording it?
I can't tell what RMRR has to do w/device assignment, other than what I said above.
Exposing RMRR's in sysfs is not an issue in general.
> We can also add this support later.
>
> Thanks
>
> Eric
>
>
>>
>> Reserved regions are populated through the IOMMU get_resv_region callback
>> (former get_dm_regions), now implemented by amd-iommu, intel-iommu and
>> arm-smmu.
>>
>> The intel-iommu reports the [FEE0_0000h - FEF0_000h] MSI window as an
>> IOMMU_RESV_NOMAP reserved region.
>>
>> arm-smmu reports the MSI window (arbitrarily located at 0x8000000 and
>> 1MB large) and the PCI host bridge windows.
>>
>> The series integrates a not officially posted patch from Robin:
>> "iommu/dma: Allow MSI-only cookies".
>>
>> This series currently does not address IRQ safety assessment.
>>
>> Best Regards
>>
>> Eric
>>
>> Git: complete series available at
>> https://github.com/eauger/linux/tree/v4.9-rc5-reserved-rfc-v3
>>
>> History:
>> RFC v2 -> v3:
>> - switch to an iommu-group sysfs API
>> - use new dummy allocator provided by Robin
>> - dummy allocator initialized by vfio-iommu-type1 after enumerating
>> the reserved regions
>> - at the moment ARM MSI base address/size is left unchanged compared
>> to v2
>> - we currently report reserved regions and not usable IOVA regions as
>> requested by Alex
>>
>> RFC v1 -> v2:
>> - fix intel_add_reserved_regions
>> - add mutex lock/unlock in vfio_iommu_type1
>>
>>
>> Eric Auger (10):
>> iommu/dma: Allow MSI-only cookies
>> iommu: Rename iommu_dm_regions into iommu_resv_regions
>> iommu: Add new reserved IOMMU attributes
>> iommu: iommu_alloc_resv_region
>> iommu: Do not map reserved regions
>> iommu: iommu_get_group_resv_regions
>> iommu: Implement reserved_regions iommu-group sysfs file
>> iommu/vt-d: Implement reserved region get/put callbacks
>> iommu/arm-smmu: Implement reserved region get/put callbacks
>> vfio/type1: Get MSI cookie
>>
>> drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c | 20 +++---
>> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 52 +++++++++++++++
>> drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>> drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 50 ++++++++++----
>> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 141 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 26 ++++++++
>> include/linux/dma-iommu.h | 7 ++
>> include/linux/iommu.h | 49 ++++++++++----
>> 8 files changed, 391 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-11 2:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-15 13:09 [RFC v3 00/10] KVM PCIe/MSI passthrough on ARM/ARM64 and IOVA reserved regions Eric Auger
2016-11-15 13:09 ` [RFC v3 01/10] iommu/dma: Allow MSI-only cookies Eric Auger
2016-11-15 13:09 ` [RFC v3 02/10] iommu: Rename iommu_dm_regions into iommu_resv_regions Eric Auger
2016-12-06 17:30 ` Robin Murphy
2016-11-15 13:09 ` [RFC v3 03/10] iommu: Add new reserved IOMMU attributes Eric Auger
2016-12-06 17:28 ` Robin Murphy
2016-11-15 13:09 ` [RFC v3 04/10] iommu: iommu_alloc_resv_region Eric Auger
2016-11-29 16:11 ` Joerg Roedel
2016-11-30 9:41 ` Auger Eric
2016-12-06 17:30 ` Robin Murphy
2016-11-15 13:09 ` [RFC v3 05/10] iommu: Do not map reserved regions Eric Auger
2016-12-06 17:36 ` Robin Murphy
2016-12-07 15:15 ` Auger Eric
2016-11-15 13:09 ` [RFC v3 06/10] iommu: iommu_get_group_resv_regions Eric Auger
2016-12-06 18:13 ` Robin Murphy
2016-12-07 15:13 ` Auger Eric
2016-11-15 13:09 ` [RFC v3 07/10] iommu: Implement reserved_regions iommu-group sysfs file Eric Auger
2016-11-15 13:09 ` [RFC v3 08/10] iommu/vt-d: Implement reserved region get/put callbacks Eric Auger
2016-11-15 13:09 ` [RFC v3 09/10] iommu/arm-smmu: " Eric Auger
2016-12-06 18:55 ` Robin Murphy
2016-12-07 15:02 ` Auger Eric
2016-12-07 18:24 ` Robin Murphy
2016-12-08 7:57 ` Auger Eric
2016-11-15 13:09 ` [RFC v3 10/10] vfio/type1: Get MSI cookie Eric Auger
2016-11-18 5:34 ` [RFC v3 00/10] KVM PCIe/MSI passthrough on ARM/ARM64 and IOVA reserved regions Bharat Bhushan
2016-11-18 8:33 ` Auger Eric
2016-11-30 9:49 ` Auger Eric
2016-11-30 10:04 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-11-30 10:14 ` Auger Eric
2016-11-30 10:52 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-11-30 13:57 ` Robin Murphy
2016-11-30 10:37 ` Will Deacon
2016-11-30 14:08 ` Auger Eric
2016-11-30 14:41 ` Robin Murphy
2016-12-07 18:52 ` Shanker Donthineni
2016-12-08 7:34 ` Auger Eric
2016-12-08 3:56 ` Bharat Bhushan
2016-12-08 9:36 ` Auger Eric
2016-12-08 13:14 ` Robin Murphy
2016-12-08 13:36 ` Auger Eric
2016-12-08 15:46 ` Robin Murphy
2016-12-08 17:01 ` Alex Williamson
2016-12-08 18:42 ` Robin Murphy
2016-12-11 2:05 ` Don Dutile [this message]
2016-12-12 8:12 ` Auger Eric
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=584CB481.3040902@redhat.com \
--to=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=diana.craciun@nxp.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger.pro@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=pranav.sawargaonkar@gmail.com \
--cc=punit.agrawal@arm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).