linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>,
	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>
Cc: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	USB <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, "Lu, Baolu" <baolu.lu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] usb: host: xhci: Handle the right timeout command
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 09:39:22 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <585B2ECA.7020703@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <585A7C20.9060500@linux.intel.com>

Hi,

On 12/21/2016 08:57 PM, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> On 21.12.2016 08:57, Lu Baolu wrote:
>> Hi Mathias,
>>
>> I have some comments for the implementation of
>> xhci_handle_command_timeout() as well.
>>
>> On 12/20/2016 11:13 PM, Mathias Nyman wrote:
>>> On 20.12.2016 09:30, Baolin Wang wrote:
>>> ...
>>>
>>> Alright, I gathered all current work related to xhci races and timeouts
>>> and put them into a branch:
>>>
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mnyman/xhci.git timeout_race_fixes
>>>
>>> Its based on 4.9
>>> It includes a few other patches just to avoid conflicts and  make my life easier
>>>
>>> Interesting patches are:
>>>
>>> ee4eb91 xhci: remove unnecessary check for pending timer
>>> 0cba67d xhci: detect stop endpoint race using pending timer instead of counter.
>>> 4f2535f xhci: Handle command completion and timeout race
>>> b9d00d7 usb: host: xhci: Fix possible wild pointer when handling abort command
>>> 529a5a0 usb: xhci: fix possible wild pointer
>>> 4766555 xhci: Fix race related to abort operation
>>> de834a3 xhci: Use delayed_work instead of timer for command timeout
>>> 69973b8 Linux 4.9
>>>
>>> The fixes for command queue races will go to usb-linus and stable, the
>>> reworks for stop ep watchdog timer will go to usb-next.
>>>
>>> Still completely untested, (well it compiles)
>>>
>>> Felipe gave instructions how to modify dwc3 driver to timeout on address
>>> devicecommands to test these, I'll try to set that up.
>>>
>>> All additional testing is welcome, especially if you can trigger timeouts
>>> and races
>>>
>>> -Mathias
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I post the code below and add my comments in line.
>>
>> 1276 void xhci_handle_command_timeout(struct work_struct *work)
>> 1277 {
>> 1278         struct xhci_hcd *xhci;
>> 1279         int ret;
>> 1280         unsigned long flags;
>> 1281         u64 hw_ring_state;
>> 1282
>> 1283         xhci = container_of(to_delayed_work(work), struct xhci_hcd, cmd_timer);
>> 1284
>> 1285         spin_lock_irqsave(&xhci->lock, flags);
>> 1286
>> 1287         /*
>> 1288          * If timeout work is pending, or current_cmd is NULL, it means we
>> 1289          * raced with command completion. Command is handled so just return.
>> 1290          */
>> 1291         if (!xhci->current_cmd || delayed_work_pending(&xhci->cmd_timer)) {
>> 1292                 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&xhci->lock, flags);
>> 1293                 return;
>> 1294         }
>> 1295         /* mark this command to be cancelled */
>> 1296         xhci->current_cmd->status = COMP_CMD_ABORT;
>> 1297
>> 1298         /* Make sure command ring is running before aborting it */
>> 1299         hw_ring_state = xhci_read_64(xhci, &xhci->op_regs->cmd_ring);
>> 1300         if ((xhci->cmd_ring_state & CMD_RING_STATE_RUNNING) &&
>> 1301             (hw_ring_state & CMD_RING_RUNNING))  {
>> 1302                 /* Prevent new doorbell, and start command abort */
>> 1303                 xhci->cmd_ring_state = CMD_RING_STATE_ABORTED;
>> 1304                 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&xhci->lock, flags);
>> 1305                 xhci_dbg(xhci, "Command timeout\n");
>> 1306                 ret = xhci_abort_cmd_ring(xhci);
>> 1307                 if (unlikely(ret == -ESHUTDOWN)) {
>> 1308                         xhci_err(xhci, "Abort command ring failed\n");
>> 1309                         xhci_cleanup_command_queue(xhci);
>> 1310                         usb_hc_died(xhci_to_hcd(xhci)->primary_hcd);
>> 1311                         xhci_dbg(xhci, "xHCI host controller is dead.\n");
>> 1312                 }
>> 1313                 return;
>> 1314         }
>> 1315
>> 1316         /* host removed. Bail out */
>> 1317         if (xhci->xhc_state & XHCI_STATE_REMOVING) {
>> 1318                 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&xhci->lock, flags);
>> 1319                 xhci_dbg(xhci, "host removed, ring start fail?\n");
>> 1320                 xhci_cleanup_command_queue(xhci);
>> 1321                 return;
>> 1322         }
>>
>> I think this part of code should be moved up to line 1295.
>
> The XHCI_STATE_REMOVING and XHCI_STATE_DYING needs a rework,
> I'm working on that.
>
> Basically we want XHCI_STATE_REMOVING to mean that  all devices are going,
> away and driver will be removed. Don't bother with re-calculating available
> bandwidths after every device removal, but do use xhci hardware to disable
> devices cleanly etc.
>
> XHCI_STATE_DYING should mean hardware is not working/responding. Don't
> bother writing any registers or queuing anything. Just return all
> pending and cancelled URBs, notify core we died, and free all allocated memory.

Okay, thanks for the information.

>
>>
>> 1323
>> 1324         /* command timeout on stopped ring, ring can't be aborted */
>> 1325         xhci_dbg(xhci, "Command timeout on stopped ring\n");
>> 1326         xhci_handle_stopped_cmd_ring(xhci, xhci->current_cmd);
>> 1327         spin_unlock_irqrestore(&xhci->lock, flags);
>>
>> This part of code is tricky. I have no idea about in which case should this
>> code be executed? Anyway, we shouldn't call xhci_handle_stopped_cmd_ring()
>> here, right?
>>
>
> This isn't changed it these patches.
>
> It will remove the aborted commands and restart the ring. It's useful if we
> want to abort a command but command ring was not running. (if for some
> unkown reason it was stopped, or forgot to restart.

Make sense.

So how about put a warning (instead of a debug message which will normally
be ignored) here?

Best regards,
Lu Baolu

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-22  1:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-05  7:51 [PATCH 1/2] usb: host: xhci: Fix possible wild pointer when handling abort command Baolin Wang
2016-12-05  7:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] usb: host: xhci: Handle the right timeout command Baolin Wang
2016-12-12 15:52   ` Mathias Nyman
2016-12-13  3:21     ` Baolin Wang
2016-12-19 10:33       ` Mathias Nyman
2016-12-19 11:34         ` Baolin Wang
2016-12-19 12:13           ` Mathias Nyman
2016-12-20  3:23             ` Baolin Wang
2016-12-20  4:29             ` Lu Baolu
2016-12-20  6:06               ` Baolin Wang
2016-12-20  6:39                 ` Lu Baolu
2016-12-20  6:46                   ` Baolin Wang
2016-12-20  7:18                     ` Lu Baolu
2016-12-20  7:30                       ` Baolin Wang
2016-12-20 15:13                         ` Mathias Nyman
2016-12-21  2:22                           ` Baolin Wang
2016-12-21 13:00                             ` Mathias Nyman
2016-12-27  3:07                               ` Baolin Wang
2017-01-02 14:57                                 ` Mathias Nyman
2017-01-03  6:20                                   ` Baolin Wang
2016-12-21  6:17                           ` Lu Baolu
2016-12-21 12:48                             ` Mathias Nyman
2016-12-21 14:10                               ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2016-12-21 15:04                                 ` Mathias Nyman
2016-12-21 15:18                                   ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2016-12-22  1:46                                     ` Lu Baolu
2016-12-23 12:54                                       ` Mathias Nyman
2016-12-22  1:43                               ` Lu Baolu
2016-12-21  6:57                           ` Lu Baolu
2016-12-21 12:57                             ` Mathias Nyman
2016-12-22  1:39                               ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2016-12-05 14:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] usb: host: xhci: Fix possible wild pointer when handling abort command Mathias Nyman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=585B2ECA.7020703@linux.intel.com \
    --to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linaro.org \
    --cc=baolu.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).