[PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add EXYNOS5433 ARM architectures entry as a supporter

[PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add EXYNOS5433 ARM architectures entry as a supporter

[Chanwoo Choi]

This patch adds the 'ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES' entry
in order to review and test the upcoming patches as a supporter.
I have developed the low-level devices and power related devices for
Exyno5433 and TM2/E board.

Moreover, Andi proposed himself as a reviewer for Exynos5433 and TM2/E.

Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com>
---
 MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index cfff2c9e3d94..96c055e8dd0b 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -1712,6 +1712,13 @@ F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/samsung-sram.txt
 F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/pd-samsung.txt
 N:	exynos
 
+ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES
+M:	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
+R:	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com>
+L:	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
+S:	Supported
+F:	arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433*
+
 ARM/SAMSUNG MOBILE MACHINE SUPPORT
 M:	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
 L:	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
-- 
1.9.1

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add EXYNOS5433 ARM architectures entry as a supporter

[Javier Martinez Canillas]

Hello Chanwoo,

On 01/05/2017 10:12 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> This patch adds the 'ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES' entry
> in order to review and test the upcoming patches as a supporter.
> I have developed the low-level devices and power related devices for
> Exyno5433 and TM2/E board.
> 
> Moreover, Andi proposed himself as a reviewer for Exynos5433 and TM2/E.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index cfff2c9e3d94..96c055e8dd0b 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -1712,6 +1712,13 @@ F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/samsung-sram.txt
>  F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/pd-samsung.txt
>  N:	exynos
>  
> +ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES
> +M:	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
> +R:	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com>
> +L:	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
> +S:	Supported
> +F:	arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433*
> +
>  ARM/SAMSUNG MOBILE MACHINE SUPPORT
>  M:	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
>  L:	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
> 

I think these fall under the "ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES" entry,
we don't have MAINTAINERS entry for individual Exynos SoCs.

What you can do is to post a patch to add Andi and you as reviewers for the
existing entry. The more people there, the better IMHO.

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add EXYNOS5433 ARM architectures entry as a supporter

[Chanwoo Choi]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2018 bytes --]

Hello Javier,

On 2017년 01월 05일 22:36, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Chanwoo,
> 
> On 01/05/2017 10:12 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> This patch adds the 'ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES' entry
>> in order to review and test the upcoming patches as a supporter.
>> I have developed the low-level devices and power related devices for
>> Exyno5433 and TM2/E board.
>>
>> Moreover, Andi proposed himself as a reviewer for Exynos5433 and TM2/E.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com>
>> ---
>>  MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index cfff2c9e3d94..96c055e8dd0b 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -1712,6 +1712,13 @@ F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/samsung-sram.txt
>>  F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/pd-samsung.txt
>>  N:	exynos
>>  
>> +ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES
>> +M:	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
>> +R:	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com>
>> +L:	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
>> +S:	Supported
>> +F:	arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433*
>> +
>>  ARM/SAMSUNG MOBILE MACHINE SUPPORT
>>  M:	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
>>  L:	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
>>
> 
> I think these fall under the "ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES" entry,
> we don't have MAINTAINERS entry for individual Exynos SoCs.

You're right. So, I just add the entry as a supporter.

> 
> What you can do is to post a patch to add Andi and you as reviewers for the
> existing entry. The more people there, the better IMHO.

Thanks for your suggestion. I think that the reviewer
of all Exynos should much times to review and test the patches.
It is very important role. But, I have not much time to review all
of Exynos patches. So, I just add the entry for Exynos5433.

-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics

[-- Attachment #2: cw00_choi.vcf --]
[-- Type: text/x-vcard, Size: 6 bytes --]

null

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add EXYNOS5433 ARM architectures entry as a supporter

[Chanwoo Choi]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1485 bytes --]

Hi,

On 2017년 01월 05일 22:18, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 05/01/2017 14:12, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> This patch adds the 'ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES' entry
>> in order to review and test the upcoming patches as a supporter.
>> I have developed the low-level devices and power related devices for
>> Exyno5433 and TM2/E board.
>>
>> Moreover, Andi proposed himself as a reviewer for Exynos5433 and TM2/E.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com>
>> ---
>>  MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index cfff2c9e3d94..96c055e8dd0b 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -1712,6 +1712,13 @@ F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/samsung-sram.txt
>>  F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/pd-samsung.txt
>>  N:	exynos
>>  
>> +ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES
>> +M:	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
>> +R:	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com>
>> +L:	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
>> +S:	Supported
>> +F:	arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433*
>> +
> 
> Does it make sense to add a MAINTAINER entry for some dts files ?
> 

I'm just helping to review the patches and test them
on real h/w target as a supporter. I can dedicate some time for this.
It would be easier for me for review if I'm cc'ed for patches.

-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics

[-- Attachment #2: cw00_choi.vcf --]
[-- Type: text/x-vcard, Size: 6 bytes --]

null

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add EXYNOS5433 ARM architectures entry as a supporter

[Andi Shyti]

Hi Daniel,

> > +ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES
> > +M:	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
> > +R:	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com>
> > +L:	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
> > +S:	Supported
> > +F:	arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433*
> > +
> 
> Does it make sense to add a MAINTAINER entry for some dts files ?

I think it does considering that exynos5433* files are more then
the half of the arm64/.../exynos/ directory.

Besides Chanwoo has authored all of them (almost) and doesn't
appear from the get_maintainers script.

Considering also that we are continuosly developing and
maintaining exynos5433 and we can test, review and compare with
the documents I think it makes more sense.

Thanks,
Andi

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add EXYNOS5433 ARM architectures entry as a supporter

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 10:41:04PM +0900, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> > > +ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES
> > > +M:	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
> > > +R:	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com>
> > > +L:	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
> > > +S:	Supported
> > > +F:	arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433*
> > > +
> > 
> > Does it make sense to add a MAINTAINER entry for some dts files ?
> 
> I think it does considering that exynos5433* files are more then
> the half of the arm64/.../exynos/ directory.
> 
> Besides Chanwoo has authored all of them (almost) and doesn't
> appear from the get_maintainers script.

He appears:
1. Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> (maintainer:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES)

2. Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> (maintainer:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES,commit_signer:26/24=100%,authored:4/24=17%)

3. Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> (reviewer:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES,commit_signer:6/24=25%)

4. Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> (commit_signer:12/24=50%,authored:8/24=33%)

5. Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> (commit_signer:9/24=38%,authored:3/24=12%)

6. Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> (commit_signer:9/24=38%)

(sorry if lines are wrapped)

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add EXYNOS5433 ARM architectures entry as a supporter

[Chanwoo Choi]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2906 bytes --]

On 2017년 01월 06일 01:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 10:41:04PM +0900, Andi Shyti wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>>>> +ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES
>>>> +M:	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
>>>> +R:	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com>
>>>> +L:	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
>>>> +S:	Supported
>>>> +F:	arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433*
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Does it make sense to add a MAINTAINER entry for some dts files ?
>>
>> I think it does considering that exynos5433* files are more then
>> the half of the arm64/.../exynos/ directory.
>>
>> Besides Chanwoo has authored all of them (almost) and doesn't
>> appear from the get_maintainers script.
> 
> He appears:
> 1. Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> (maintainer:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES)
> 
> 2. Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> (maintainer:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES,commit_signer:26/24=100%,authored:4/24=17%)
> 
> 3. Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> (reviewer:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES,commit_signer:6/24=25%)
> 
> 4. Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> (commit_signer:12/24=50%,authored:8/24=33%)
> 
> 5. Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> (commit_signer:9/24=38%,authored:3/24=12%)
> 
> 6. Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> (commit_signer:9/24=38%)
> 
> (sorry if lines are wrapped)

I have a question.

When I tested the get_maintainer script with Exynos5444 patch,
I cannot get the same result from you.

I tested the following patch[1] which was already merged by Marek.
[1] commit-id: 74c78036d5b5970266fa2075a17c9b89cabf873e
- ("arm64: dts: exynos: TM2 - add support for MFC video codec device"

./scripts/get_maintainer.pl 0001-arm64-dts-exynos-TM2-add-support-for-MFC-video-codec.patch 
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> (maintainer:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS)
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> (maintainer:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS)
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> (maintainer:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE))
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> (maintainer:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE))
Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> (maintainer:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES)
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> (maintainer:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES)
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> (reviewer:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES)
devicetree@vger.kernel.org (open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS)
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated list:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE))
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org (moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES)
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)

Also, when I tested the exynos5433-tm2e.dts patch, I got the same result.

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics

[-- Attachment #2: cw00_choi.vcf --]
[-- Type: text/x-vcard, Size: 6 bytes --]

null

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add EXYNOS5433 ARM architectures entry as a supporter

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 12:21:44PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> On 2017년 01월 06일 01:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 10:41:04PM +0900, Andi Shyti wrote:
> >> Hi Daniel,
> >>
> >>>> +ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES
> >>>> +M:	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
> >>>> +R:	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com>
> >>>> +L:	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
> >>>> +S:	Supported
> >>>> +F:	arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433*
> >>>> +
> >>>
> >>> Does it make sense to add a MAINTAINER entry for some dts files ?
> >>
> >> I think it does considering that exynos5433* files are more then
> >> the half of the arm64/.../exynos/ directory.
> >>
> >> Besides Chanwoo has authored all of them (almost) and doesn't
> >> appear from the get_maintainers script.
> > 
> > He appears:
> > 1. Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> (maintainer:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES)
> > 
> > 2. Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> (maintainer:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES,commit_signer:26/24=100%,authored:4/24=17%)
> > 
> > 3. Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> (reviewer:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES,commit_signer:6/24=25%)
> > 
> > 4. Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> (commit_signer:12/24=50%,authored:8/24=33%)
> > 
> > 5. Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> (commit_signer:9/24=38%,authored:3/24=12%)
> > 
> > 6. Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> (commit_signer:9/24=38%)
> > 
> > (sorry if lines are wrapped)
> 
> I have a question.
> 
> When I tested the get_maintainer script with Exynos5444 patch,
> I cannot get the same result from you.

The behavior of get_maintainers.pl changed few months ago and now it
prints recent GIT activity only when there are no maintainers. To me
personally, this is desired because otherwise a lot of people will be
spammed on every patch. If someone wants to notify not only maintainers
but also other people then he should use --git (which was used for
output above).

Best regards,
Krzysztof

> 
> I tested the following patch[1] which was already merged by Marek.
> [1] commit-id: 74c78036d5b5970266fa2075a17c9b89cabf873e
> - ("arm64: dts: exynos: TM2 - add support for MFC video codec device"
> 
> ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl 0001-arm64-dts-exynos-TM2-add-support-for-MFC-video-codec.patch 
> Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> (maintainer:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS)
> Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> (maintainer:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS)
> Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> (maintainer:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE))
> Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> (maintainer:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE))
> Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> (maintainer:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES)
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> (maintainer:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES)
> Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> (reviewer:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES)
> devicetree@vger.kernel.org (open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS)
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated list:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE))
> linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org (moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES)
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
> 
> Also, when I tested the exynos5433-tm2e.dts patch, I got the same result.
> 
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Krzysztof
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best Regards,
> Chanwoo Choi
> Samsung Electronics

> null

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add EXYNOS5433 ARM architectures entry as a supporter

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 10:12:49PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> This patch adds the 'ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES' entry
> in order to review and test the upcoming patches as a supporter.
> I have developed the low-level devices and power related devices for
> Exyno5433 and TM2/E board.
> 
> Moreover, Andi proposed himself as a reviewer for Exynos5433 and TM2/E.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index cfff2c9e3d94..96c055e8dd0b 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -1712,6 +1712,13 @@ F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/samsung-sram.txt
>  F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/pd-samsung.txt
>  N:	exynos
>  
> +ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES
> +M:	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
> +R:	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com>
> +L:	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
> +S:	Supported
> +F:	arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433*
> +

Review and testing is always highly appreciated and you are doing,
Chanwoo, great work. I would like to sincerely thank you for that.
Samsung probably should thank you, as well. :)

As for the additional sub-entry, I do not see any need for creating
such entries for specific DTSes. This looks like overkill.

At the same time I would like to strongly avoid something which is
happening for example in our DRM where we have *four* maintainers but
only *one* is responding. We can add bazilions of maintainers to satisfy
Samsung KPIs but still this might not help reviewing patches (damn, why
am I waiting with this small [0] thing since 21st of October?).

On the other hand, this is just my personal opinion. If the broad
open-source community would like to do any changes here
(add/remove/move/whatever) I do not mind at all.

Best regards and happy New Year! :D
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add EXYNOS5433 ARM architectures entry as a supporter

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 7:09 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 10:12:49PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> This patch adds the 'ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES' entry
>> in order to review and test the upcoming patches as a supporter.
>> I have developed the low-level devices and power related devices for
>> Exyno5433 and TM2/E board.
>>
>> Moreover, Andi proposed himself as a reviewer for Exynos5433 and TM2/E.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com>
>> ---
>>  MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index cfff2c9e3d94..96c055e8dd0b 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -1712,6 +1712,13 @@ F:     Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/samsung-sram.txt
>>  F:   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/pd-samsung.txt
>>  N:   exynos
>>
>> +ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES
>> +M:   Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
>> +R:   Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com>
>> +L:   linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
>> +S:   Supported
>> +F:   arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433*
>> +
>
> Review and testing is always highly appreciated and you are doing,
> Chanwoo, great work. I would like to sincerely thank you for that.
> Samsung probably should thank you, as well. :)
>
> As for the additional sub-entry, I do not see any need for creating
> such entries for specific DTSes. This looks like overkill.
>
> At the same time I would like to strongly avoid something which is
> happening for example in our DRM where we have *four* maintainers but
> only *one* is responding. We can add bazilions of maintainers to satisfy
> Samsung KPIs but still this might not help reviewing patches (damn, why
> am I waiting with this small [0] thing since 21st of October?).
>
> On the other hand, this is just my personal opinion. If the broad
> open-source community would like to do any changes here
> (add/remove/move/whatever) I do not mind at all.

Ah, forgot the link:
[0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9391635/

Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add EXYNOS5433 ARM architectures entry as a supporter

[Chanwoo Choi]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2540 bytes --]

Hi Krzysztof,

On 2017년 01월 06일 02:09, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 10:12:49PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> This patch adds the 'ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES' entry
>> in order to review and test the upcoming patches as a supporter.
>> I have developed the low-level devices and power related devices for
>> Exyno5433 and TM2/E board.
>>
>> Moreover, Andi proposed himself as a reviewer for Exynos5433 and TM2/E.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com>
>> ---
>>  MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index cfff2c9e3d94..96c055e8dd0b 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -1712,6 +1712,13 @@ F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/samsung-sram.txt
>>  F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/pd-samsung.txt
>>  N:	exynos
>>  
>> +ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES
>> +M:	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
>> +R:	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com>
>> +L:	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
>> +S:	Supported
>> +F:	arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433*
>> +
> 
> Review and testing is always highly appreciated and you are doing,
> Chanwoo, great work. I would like to sincerely thank you for that.
> Samsung probably should thank you, as well. :)
> 
> As for the additional sub-entry, I do not see any need for creating
> such entries for specific DTSes. This looks like overkill.
> 

I'm in charge of verifying the all features of Exynos5433 and testing
the Exynos5433-based TM/TM2E board in order to guarantee the stabilization
and performance with Platform because TM2/TM2E is Tizen reference board.
So, I just proposed this patch to prevent the missing patch.

But, if you think it is not proper, I respect the opinion of maintainer.

> At the same time I would like to strongly avoid something which is
> happening for example in our DRM where we have *four* maintainers but
> only *one* is responding. We can add bazilions of maintainers to satisfy
> Samsung KPIs but still this might not help reviewing patches (damn, why
> am I waiting with this small [0] thing since 21st of October?).
> 
> On the other hand, this is just my personal opinion. If the broad
> open-source community would like to do any changes here
> (add/remove/move/whatever) I do not mind at all.
> 
> Best regards and happy New Year! :D
> Krzysztof
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics

[-- Attachment #2: cw00_choi.vcf --]
[-- Type: text/x-vcard, Size: 6 bytes --]

null