From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755316Ab0CER62 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Mar 2010 12:58:28 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f219.google.com ([209.85.220.219]:52991 "EHLO mail-fx0-f219.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755039Ab0CER61 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Mar 2010 12:58:27 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=kgDOCmYHsC3S0qnx4KZafPj5xakVwNQJuLCWdj3CoJqSdoxmfQ4rclOwwsA3ROaTrH Cd9fI5KwMsqEL4eMbBz4btAGMJ6X5R5+Mwv9SnV55MXt7Aam+lzfmYCKm/48JpqA9lQ4 OeTSOhrx2XVryIeOjVXtzd39wkJ4kvxJUqBU4= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20100305.080516.180132092.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20100305154009.GC2505@tempa> <20100305.074835.159078083.davem@davemloft.net> <20100305160217.663413eb@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20100305.080516.180132092.davem@davemloft.net> From: Younes Manton Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 12:58:05 -0500 Message-ID: <586c2acd1003050958p49c9f27u8331756183c419cb@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [git pull] drm request 3 To: David Miller Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, skeggsb@gmail.com, airlied@linux.ie, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, daniel@fooishbar.org, dri-devel@lists.sf.net, mingo@elte.hu, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 11:05 AM, David Miller wrote: > From: Alan Cox > Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 16:02:17 +0000 > >>> You can't unleash something like this on a userbase of this magnitude >>> and then throw your hands up in the air and say "I'm not willing to >>> support this in a reasonable way." >> >> Not to belabour the obvious - they didn't. Linus ordered them to merge it. > > And I'm arguing not merging it upstream would be like saying > the same thing. > No, it's not like saying the same thing. Not merging it upstream is saying "we're not willing to support this in a reasonable way *at this time*."