From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935770AbdAKCDG (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2017 21:03:06 -0500 Received: from regular1.263xmail.com ([211.150.99.132]:47016 "EHLO regular1.263xmail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751091AbdAKCDE (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2017 21:03:04 -0500 X-263anti-spam: KSV:0; X-MAIL-GRAY: 0 X-MAIL-DELIVERY: 1 X-KSVirus-check: 0 X-ABS-CHECKED: 4 X-RL-SENDER: zhengxing@rock-chips.com X-FST-TO: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-SENDER-IP: 58.22.7.114 X-LOGIN-NAME: zhengxing@rock-chips.com X-UNIQUE-TAG: <8e356687445e9542f2467fc7e1e812c2> X-ATTACHMENT-NUM: 0 X-DNS-TYPE: 0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: add "rockchip, grf" property for RK3399 PMUCRU/CRU To: Heiko Stuebner References: <1484028930-20305-1-git-send-email-zhengxing@rock-chips.com> <58758498.40309@rock-chips.com> <1799437.apf7OqdtKq@phil> Cc: Doug Anderson , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Caesar Wang , Shawn Lin , Brian Norris , Jianqun Xu , Elaine Zhang , David Wu , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" From: Xing Zheng Message-ID: <58759249.4020808@rock-chips.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 10:02:49 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1799437.apf7OqdtKq@phil> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Heiko, On 2017年01月11日 09:12, Heiko Stuebner wrote: >> I just woud like to add this patch to avoid getting some unavailable >> MUXGRF clock and need to debug it again, >> if we support it one day in future. > could you just check, if we have any other grf-based muxes that we may need in > the future. Right now I only see pclkin_isp1_wrapper describing such a mux, > but it would be cool if you could check again. > > OK, we will check these. :) Thanks. -- - Xing Zheng