linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] usb: dbc: early driver for xhci debug capability
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 12:44:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5886DBB7.4070501@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170122090423.GA15061@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1954 bytes --]

Hi Ingo,

On 01/22/2017 05:04 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>>>> +static void xdbc_runtime_delay(unsigned long count)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	udelay(count);
>>>> +}
>>>> +static void (*xdbc_delay)(unsigned long) = xdbc_early_delay;
>>> Is this udelay() complication really necessary? udelay() should work fine even in 
>>> early code. It might not be precisely calibrated, but should be good enough.
>> I tried udelay() in the early code. It's not precise enough for the
>> hardware handshaking.
> Possibly because on x86 early udelay() did not work at all - i.e. there's no delay 
> whatsoever.

Yes.

>
> Could you try it on top of this commit in tip:timers/core:
>
>   4c45c5167c95 x86/timer: Make delay() work during early bootup
>
> ?

I tried tip:timers/core. It's not precise enough for my context either.

__const_udelay().

157 inline void __const_udelay(unsigned long xloops)
158 {
159         unsigned long lpj = this_cpu_read(cpu_info.loops_per_jiffy) ? : loops_per_jiffy;
160         int d0;
161
162         xloops *= 4;
163         asm("mull %%edx"
164                 :"=d" (xloops), "=&a" (d0)
165                 :"1" (xloops), "0" (lpj * (HZ / 4)));
166
167         __delay(++xloops);
168 }


In my early  code, loops_per_jiffy is not initialized yet. Hence "lpj" for the asm line
is 4096 (default value).

The  cpu_info.loops_per_jiffy actually reads 8832000 after initialization. They are
about 2000 times different.

I did a hacky test in kernel to check the difference between these two different
"lpj" values. (The hacky patch is attached.) Below is the output for 100ms delay.

[    2.494751] udelay_test uninitialized ---->start
[    2.494820] udelay_test uninitialized ---->end
[    2.494828] udelay_test initialized ---->start
[    2.595234] udelay_test initialized ---->end

For 100ms delay, udelay() with uninitialized loops_per_jiffy only gives a delay of
only 69us.

Best regards,
Lu Baolu

[-- Attachment #2: kernel-hack.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2325 bytes --]

diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/delay.c b/arch/x86/lib/delay.c
index a8e91ae..ffc2874 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/delay.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/delay.c
@@ -168,6 +168,36 @@ inline void __const_udelay(unsigned long xloops)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__const_udelay);
 
+void udelay_uninitialized(unsigned long xloops)
+{
+	unsigned long lpj = (1<<12);
+	int d0;
+
+	xloops *= 0x10c7ul;
+	xloops *= 4;
+	asm("mull %%edx"
+		:"=d" (xloops), "=&a" (d0)
+		:"1" (xloops), "0" (lpj * (HZ / 4)));
+
+	delay_loop(++xloops);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(udelay_uninitialized);
+
+void udelay_initialized(unsigned long xloops)
+{
+	unsigned long lpj = this_cpu_read(cpu_info.loops_per_jiffy);
+	int d0;
+
+	xloops *= 0x10c7ul;
+	xloops *= 4;
+	asm("mull %%edx"
+		:"=d" (xloops), "=&a" (d0)
+		:"1" (xloops), "0" (lpj * (HZ / 4)));
+
+	delay_loop(++xloops);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(udelay_initialized);
+
 void __udelay(unsigned long usecs)
 {
 	__const_udelay(usecs * 0x000010c7); /* 2**32 / 1000000 (rounded up) */
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
index 954abfd..b6a7437 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
@@ -302,6 +302,21 @@ static int xhci_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
 	/* USB-2 and USB-3 roothubs initialized, allow runtime pm suspend */
 	pm_runtime_put_noidle(&dev->dev);
 
+	do {
+		int count = 1000;
+
+		pr_notice("udelay_test uninitialized ---->start\n");
+		while (count-- > 0)
+			udelay_uninitialized(100);
+		pr_notice("udelay_test uninitialized ---->end\n");
+
+		count = 1000;
+		pr_notice("udelay_test initialized ---->start\n");
+		while (count-- > 0)
+			udelay_initialized(100);
+		pr_notice("udelay_test initialized ---->end\n");
+	} while (0);
+
 	return 0;
 
 put_usb3_hcd:
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/delay.h b/include/asm-generic/delay.h
index 0f79054..200ab55 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/delay.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/delay.h
@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ extern void __udelay(unsigned long usecs);
 extern void __ndelay(unsigned long nsecs);
 extern void __const_udelay(unsigned long xloops);
 extern void __delay(unsigned long loops);
+extern void udelay_uninitialized(unsigned long xloops);
+extern void udelay_initialized(unsigned long xloops);
 
 /*
  * The weird n/20000 thing suppresses a "comparison is always false due to

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-24  4:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-15  6:02 [PATCH v5 0/4] usb: early: add support for early printk through USB3 debug port Lu Baolu
2016-11-15  6:02 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] usb: dbc: early driver for xhci debug capability Lu Baolu
2017-01-19  9:37   ` Ingo Molnar
2017-01-20  2:47     ` Lu Baolu
2017-01-22  9:04       ` Ingo Molnar
2017-01-24  4:44         ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2017-01-24  8:20           ` Ingo Molnar
2017-01-25  5:28             ` Lu Baolu
2017-01-25  9:23               ` Ingo Molnar
2017-01-25  9:57                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-25 12:27                   ` Lu Baolu
2017-01-25 14:38                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-25 15:51                       ` Lu Baolu
2017-01-25 16:16                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-26  3:37                           ` Lu Baolu
2017-01-26  7:19                             ` Ingo Molnar
2017-01-26  7:49                               ` Lu Baolu
2017-01-26  8:17                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-01-26 10:28                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-26 16:01                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-01-26 17:39                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-27  6:51                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2017-02-09  5:59                               ` Lu Baolu
2017-01-26  7:22                         ` Ingo Molnar
2017-02-09  7:37                           ` Lu Baolu
2017-01-25 12:17                 ` Lu Baolu
2017-01-26  3:26                 ` Lu Baolu
2016-11-15  6:02 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] x86: add support for earlyprintk via USB3 debug port Lu Baolu
2017-01-19  9:38   ` Ingo Molnar
2017-01-20  2:48     ` Lu Baolu
2016-11-15  6:02 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] usb: serial: usb_debug: add support for dbc debug device Lu Baolu
2017-01-19  9:39   ` Ingo Molnar
2017-01-20  2:50     ` Lu Baolu
2016-11-15  6:02 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] usb: doc: add document for USB3 debug port usage Lu Baolu
2017-01-19  9:41   ` Ingo Molnar
2017-01-20  2:53     ` Lu Baolu
2017-01-18  6:20 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] usb: early: add support for early printk through USB3 debug port Lu Baolu
2017-01-19  9:06   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-01-19  9:09     ` Ingo Molnar
2017-01-19 11:24       ` Mathias Nyman
2017-01-19  9:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-01-20  2:56   ` Lu Baolu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5886DBB7.4070501@linux.intel.com \
    --to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).