From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>,
Nate Watterson <nwatters@codeaurora.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI/IORT: Fix iort_node_get_id() mapping entries indexing
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 10:20:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5893E8ED.1010107@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170110120020.17867-1-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
On 01/10/2017 08:00 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> Commit 618f535a6062 ("ACPI/IORT: Add single mapping function")
> introduced a function (iort_node_get_id()) to retrieve ids for IORT
> named components.
>
> The iort_node_get_id() takes an index as input to refer to a specific
> mapping entry in the named component IORT node mapping array.
>
> For a mapping entry at a given index, iort_node_get_id() should return
> the id value (through the id_out function parameter) and the IORT node
> output_reference (through function return value) the given mapping entry
> refers to.
>
> Technically output_reference values may differ for different map
> entries, (see diagram below - mapped id values may refer to different eg
> IORT SMMU nodes; the kernel may not be able to handle different
> output_reference values for a given named component but the IORT kernel
> layer should still report the IORT mappings as reported by firmware) but
> current code in iort_node_get_id() fails to use the index function
> parameter to return the correct output_reference value (ie it always
> returns the output_reference value of the first entry in the mapping
> array whilst using the index correctly to retrieve the id value from the
> respective entry).
>
> |----------------------|
> | named component |
> |----------------------|
> | map entry[0] |
> |----------------------|
> | id value |
> | output_reference----------------> eg SMMU 1
> |----------------------|
> | map entry[1] |
> |----------------------|
> | id value |
> | output_reference----------------> eg SMMU 2
> |----------------------|
> .
> .
> .
> |----------------------|
> | map entry[N] |
> |----------------------|
> | id value |
> | output_reference----------------> eg SMMU 1
> |----------------------|
>
> Consequently the iort_node_get_id() function always returns the IORT
> node pointed at by the output_reference value of the first named
> component mapping array entry, irrespective of the index parameter,
> which is a bug.
>
> Update the map array entry pointer computation in iort_node_get_id() to
> take into account the index value, fixing the issue.
>
> Fixes: 618f535a6062 ("ACPI/IORT: Add single mapping function")
> Reported-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> Cc: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
> Cc: Nate Watterson <nwatters@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
> - Updated/improved commit log
> - Added review tags
Forgot to mention that I tested this patch on Hisilicon
D03,
Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
BTW, Lorenzo, Rafael, since it's a bugfix, can this be merged into
4.10-rc7?
Thanks
Hanjun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-03 2:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-10 12:00 [PATCH v2] ACPI/IORT: Fix iort_node_get_id() mapping entries indexing Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-01-10 15:53 ` Sinan Kaya
2017-02-03 2:20 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2017-02-03 8:57 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5893E8ED.1010107@linaro.org \
--to=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=nwatters@codeaurora.org \
--cc=okaya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tn@semihalf.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox